Comparison of Deep Learning Explainable Approaches for Medical Image Analysis

This article explores the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods to improve the interpretability and trustworthiness of neural network predictions for medical application. Our research uses two well-established convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures: VGG-16 and ResNet50. Subsequently, we optimized the networks, which led to a final accuracy of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$99.24 {\%}$</tex> for VGG-16 and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$98.48{\%}$</tex> for ResNet50. In the Python programming environment, we used the far-reaching XAI toolkit, Quantus. Using techniques such as saliency maps and integrated gradients offered by Quantus, we were able to pinpoint the critical pixels influencing each prediction made by the networks. While VGG-16 achieved slightly higher accuracy, it also had longer training times compared to the faster ResNet50.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/elmar62909.2024.10694137
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Deep Learning Explainable Approaches for Medical Image Analysis

Roberta Hlavata, Róbert Hudec, Patrik Kamencay, Andrej Pisarcik
1 citations
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.40
article

Comparison of Deep Learning Explainable Approaches for Medical Image Analysis

Roberta Hlavata, Róbert Hudec, Patrik Kamencay, Andrej Pisarcik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods to improve the interpretability and trustworthiness of neural network predictions for medical application. Our research uses two well-established convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures: VGG-16 and ResNet50. Subsequently, we optimized the networks, which led to a final accuracy of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$99.24 {\%}$</tex> for VGG-16 and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$98.48{\%}$</tex> for ResNet50. In the Python programming environment, we used the far-reaching XAI toolkit, Quantus. Using techniques such as saliency maps and integrated gradients offered by Quantus, we were able to pinpoint the critical pixels influencing each prediction made by the networks. While VGG-16 achieved slightly higher accuracy, it also had longer training times compared to the faster ResNet50.

University of Žilina (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Deep Learning Explainable Approaches for Medical Image Analysis — Roberta Hlavata, Róbert Hudec, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS