Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them

This article allows readers to assess their ability to detect errors in thinking in seven case histories of psychologists' thoughts about cognitive science. It explains the nature of the errors and shows that some of them reflect faulty reasoning. It presents a "model method" to improve reasoning. It is based on the theory of mental models, which gives a general account of how individuals think, both deductively and indicatively, and which postulates that individuals construct mental models of possibilities in the world. The model method enhances both the accuracy and speed of reasoning. The article concludes with some general reflections on the role of knowledge of meanings, the world, and context in thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eNeuro
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0380-24.2024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them

P. N. Johnson‐Laird
1 citations
eNeuro
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
3.82
article

Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them

P. N. Johnson‐Laird
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article allows readers to assess their ability to detect errors in thinking in seven case histories of psychologists' thoughts about cognitive science. It explains the nature of the errors and shows that some of them reflect faulty reasoning. It presents a "model method" to improve reasoning. It is based on the theory of mental models, which gives a general account of how individuals think, both deductively and indicatively, and which postulates that individuals construct mental models of possibilities in the world. The model method enhances both the accuracy and speed of reasoning. The article concludes with some general reflections on the role of knowledge of meanings, the world, and context in thinking.

eNeuroVol. 11(10)
VNS Health (US), Princeton University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
3.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.