Planning guidance to limit hot food takeaways: Understanding the possible economic impacts

Local and national policymakers are seeking innovative solutions to create healthier food environments around the world. Between 2009 and 2017, 35 local authorities across England (UK) adopted planning guidance designed to limit the proliferation of hot food takeaways near schools. Whilst these policies are intended to improve population health, they are also likely to have economic impacts. Often a decision to introduce such policies comes down to consideration of whether the short-term economic imperatives of allowing new takeaway outlets to open outweighs the potential long-term public health implications and associated economic consequences. These potential negative and positive economic impacts have not previously been clearly described and are summarised here. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the potential economic impacts of takeaway management zones. In particular, we present a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) that outlines the possible economic impacts of takeaway management zones based on researcher knowledge of the interventions and the industry. Potential negative impacts fall across sectors and may include a loss of employment opportunities and reductions in local and national tax receipts, and may impact the economic vitality of local communities. In the longer term, there is the potential for positive impacts such as reductions in healthcare resource utilisation, social care expenditure and sickness-related absence from work. Part of a robust case would a better economic understanding, that would enable local authorities to improve understanding of the trade-offs associated with the policy, such as short-versus long-term, and business-related versus society-related health benefits and costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38798
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planning guidance to limit hot food takeaways: Understanding the possible economic impacts

Oliver Mytton, Bochu Liu, Richard Smith, John Rahilly et al.
1 citations
Heliyon
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
1.13
article

Planning guidance to limit hot food takeaways: Understanding the possible economic impacts

Oliver Mytton, Bochu Liu, Richard Smith, John Rahilly, Daniel William Derbyshire, Matthew Keeble, Ben Amies‐Cull, Jean M Adams, Claire Thompson, Suzan Hassan, Steven Cummins, Antonieta Medina‐Lara, Martin J. White, Thomas Burgoine, Michael A. Chang, Bea Savory
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Local and national policymakers are seeking innovative solutions to create healthier food environments around the world. Between 2009 and 2017, 35 local authorities across England (UK) adopted planning guidance designed to limit the proliferation of hot food takeaways near schools. Whilst these policies are intended to improve population health, they are also likely to have economic impacts. Often a decision to introduce such policies comes down to consideration of whether the short-term economic imperatives of allowing new takeaway outlets to open outweighs the potential long-term public health implications and associated economic consequences. These potential negative and positive economic impacts have not previously been clearly described and are summarised here. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the potential economic impacts of takeaway management zones. In particular, we present a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) that outlines the possible economic impacts of takeaway management zones based on researcher knowledge of the interventions and the industry. Potential negative impacts fall across sectors and may include a loss of employment opportunities and reductions in local and national tax receipts, and may impact the economic vitality of local communities. In the longer term, there is the potential for positive impacts such as reductions in healthcare resource utilisation, social care expenditure and sickness-related absence from work. Part of a robust case would a better economic understanding, that would enable local authorities to improve understanding of the trade-offs associated with the policy, such as short-versus long-term, and business-related versus society-related health benefits and costs.

HeliyonVol. 10(20)
Tongji University (CN), University of Hertfordshire (GB), University of Antwerp (BE), University of Exeter (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Faculty of Public Health (GB), Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute (CN), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB), University College London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Medical Research Council, Public Health Research Programme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.