Beyond the lab: Feasibility of cognitive neuroscience data collection during a speleological expedition

In human cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology studies, laboratory-based research tasks have been important to establish principles of brain function and its relationship to behaviour; however, they differ greatly from real-life experiences. Several elements of real-life situations that impact human performance, such as stressors, are difficult or impossible to replicate in the laboratory. Expeditions offer unique possibilities for studying human cognition in complex environments that can transfer to other situations with similar features. For example, as caves share several of the physical and psychological challenges of safety-critical environments such as spaceflight, underground expeditions have been developed as an analogue for astronaut training purposes, suggesting that they might also be suitable for studying aspects of behaviour and cognition that cannot be fully examined under laboratory conditions. While a large range of topics and tools have been proposed for application in such environments, few have been used in the field. Methods and procedures for maximizing the robustness and scientific value of expedition research designs must first be developed and validated. We tested the feasibility of collecting human physiological, cognitive, and subjective experience data concerning brain state, sleep, cognitive workload, and fatigue, during a speleological expedition in a remote region. We document our approaches and challenges experienced, and provide recommendations and suggestions to aid future work. The data support the idea that cave expeditions are relevant naturalistic paradigms that offer unique possibilities for cognitive neuroscience to complement laboratory work and help improve human performance and safety in operational environments. • Studying complex, naturalistic behaviours in humans complements laboratory work investigating brain function and behaviour. • The current work tested data collection techniques and tools, in the context of a speleological expedition. • Results support the feasibility of data collection in real expeditions and suggest practical steps for robust fieldwork. • We propose a framework categorizing experimental designs and addressing challenges in naturalistic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102443
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the lab: Feasibility of cognitive neuroscience data collection during a speleological expedition

Hugo R. Jourde, Emily B. J. Coffey, Giovanni Beltrame, Samuel Bassetto et al.
2 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.41
article

Beyond the lab: Feasibility of cognitive neuroscience data collection during a speleological expedition

Hugo R. Jourde, Emily B. J. Coffey, Giovanni Beltrame, Samuel Bassetto, Anita Paas, Arnaud Brignol, Marie‐Anick Savard, Zseyvfin Eyqvelle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In human cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology studies, laboratory-based research tasks have been important to establish principles of brain function and its relationship to behaviour; however, they differ greatly from real-life experiences. Several elements of real-life situations that impact human performance, such as stressors, are difficult or impossible to replicate in the laboratory. Expeditions offer unique possibilities for studying human cognition in complex environments that can transfer to other situations with similar features. For example, as caves share several of the physical and psychological challenges of safety-critical environments such as spaceflight, underground expeditions have been developed as an analogue for astronaut training purposes, suggesting that they might also be suitable for studying aspects of behaviour and cognition that cannot be fully examined under laboratory conditions. While a large range of topics and tools have been proposed for application in such environments, few have been used in the field. Methods and procedures for maximizing the robustness and scientific value of expedition research designs must first be developed and validated. We tested the feasibility of collecting human physiological, cognitive, and subjective experience data concerning brain state, sleep, cognitive workload, and fatigue, during a speleological expedition in a remote region. We document our approaches and challenges experienced, and provide recommendations and suggestions to aid future work. The data support the idea that cave expeditions are relevant naturalistic paradigms that offer unique possibilities for cognitive neuroscience to complement laboratory work and help improve human performance and safety in operational environments. • Studying complex, naturalistic behaviours in humans complements laboratory work investigating brain function and behaviour. • The current work tested data collection techniques and tools, in the context of a speleological expedition. • Results support the feasibility of data collection in real expeditions and suggest practical steps for robust fieldwork. • We propose a framework categorizing experimental designs and addressing challenges in naturalistic settings.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 99
Polytechnique Montréal (CA), Concordia University (CA), École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Canadian Space Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.