Single Institutional Cross-Sectional Phone Survey Study: Evaluation of Causes for Loss to Follow-up After Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation

This paper, the first cross-sectional study of loss to follow-up among patients who are implanted with SCS devices, identifies that up to 19% of patients are quickly lost to follow-up after implantation. Only half of the patients in this study could be reached, with most successfully using their device for meaningful pain control, but a substantial number of patients likely required additional device optimization for pain relief.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Physician
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2024.27.441
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single Institutional Cross-Sectional Phone Survey Study: Evaluation of Causes for Loss to Follow-up After Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation

Michael E Schatman, Alan D. Kaye, Christopher L Robinson, Cyrus Yazdi et al.
2 citations
Pain Physician
Pain Management and Treatment
1.28
article

Single Institutional Cross-Sectional Phone Survey Study: Evaluation of Causes for Loss to Follow-up After Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation

Michael E Schatman, Alan D. Kaye, Christopher L Robinson, Cyrus Yazdi, Jatinder Gill, Thomas Simopoulos, Michael Glicksman, Johnson Ho, Alexandra Fonseca, Jamal Hasoon, Sravya Madabhushi, Anh Phung Ngo, Kevin Hoang, Kyle Kang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper, the first cross-sectional study of loss to follow-up among patients who are implanted with SCS devices, identifies that up to 19% of patients are quickly lost to follow-up after implantation. Only half of the patients in this study could be reached, with most successfully using their device for meaningful pain control, but a substantial number of patients likely required additional device optimization for pain relief.

Pain PhysicianVol. 27(7)
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Pain Management and Treatment
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.