Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP Materi Geometri Ditinjau Gaya Kognitif Dan Tingkat Berfikir Geometri Van Hiele

Abstract Studying geometry can develop the ability to reason or think logically to solve problems related to shape statements, size, relative position of images, and the nature of space. Mathematical reasoning is students' thinking power in concluding and is the highest mathematical cognitive domain. Middle school-level students need help in mathematical reasoning at the conclusion-drawing stage. Qualitative descriptive research to describe the mathematical reasoning abilities of junior high school students. The research subjects for class VIII A UPT SMP Negeri 22 Gresik consisted of three field-dependent cognitive style students and three field-independent cognitive style students. Analysis of research data from the results of written tests and interviews with mathematical reasoning instruments on congruence and similarity of flat shapes and the Van Hiele Geometry Test. The results of research on the relationship between stages of geometric thinking levels and indicators of mathematical reasoning ability of two level 1 students, visualization meets three indicators; two analysis level 2 students met three indicators; and two level 3 students of informal deduction abstraction met five indicators. The average mathematical reasoning ability of the five indicators only provides reasons for several solutions and cannot check the validity of an argument and draw appropriate conclusions. Abstrak Mempelajari geometri dapat menumbuh kembangkan kemampuan dalam bernalar atau berpikir logis memecahkan masalah berkaitan dengan pernyataan bentuk, ukuran posisi relatif gambar, dan sifat ruang. Penalaran matematis adalah daya pikir siswa dalam menarik kesimpulan sesuatu dan ranah kognitif matematis paling tinggi. Siswa tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama kesulitan dalam penalaran matematis pada tahapan penarikan kesimpulan. Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan tujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Subjek penelitian kelas VIII A UPT SMP Negeri 22 Gresik terdiri dari tiga siswa gaya kognitif Field Dependent dan tiga siswa gaya kognitif Field Independent. Analisis data peneliti dari hasil tes tertulis dan wawancara instrumen penalaran matematis kekongruenan dan kesebangunan bangun datar dan Van Hiele Geometry Test. Hasil penelitian hubungan antara tahapan tingkat berpikir geometri dan indikator kemampuan penalaran matematis dua siswa tingkat 1 visualisasi memenuhi tiga indikator; dua siswa tingkat 2 analisis memenuhi tiga indikator; dan dua siswa tingkat 3 abstraksi deduksi informal memenuhi lima indikator. Kemampuan penalaran matematis rata – rata dari lima indikator hanya pada memberikan alasan terhadap beberapa solusi dan belum dapat memeriksa kesahihan suatu argumen dan menarik kesimpulan yang tepat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Postulat Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30587/postulat.v5i1.7583
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP Materi Geometri Ditinjau Gaya Kognitif Dan Tingkat Berfikir Geometri Van Hiele

Ahmad Heri Setiyawan, Nur Fauziyah, Ahmad Fadholi
Postulat Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP Materi Geometri Ditinjau Gaya Kognitif Dan Tingkat Berfikir Geometri Van Hiele

Ahmad Heri Setiyawan, Nur Fauziyah, Ahmad Fadholi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Studying geometry can develop the ability to reason or think logically to solve problems related to shape statements, size, relative position of images, and the nature of space. Mathematical reasoning is students' thinking power in concluding and is the highest mathematical cognitive domain. Middle school-level students need help in mathematical reasoning at the conclusion-drawing stage. Qualitative descriptive research to describe the mathematical reasoning abilities of junior high school students. The research subjects for class VIII A UPT SMP Negeri 22 Gresik consisted of three field-dependent cognitive style students and three field-independent cognitive style students. Analysis of research data from the results of written tests and interviews with mathematical reasoning instruments on congruence and similarity of flat shapes and the Van Hiele Geometry Test. The results of research on the relationship between stages of geometric thinking levels and indicators of mathematical reasoning ability of two level 1 students, visualization meets three indicators; two analysis level 2 students met three indicators; and two level 3 students of informal deduction abstraction met five indicators. The average mathematical reasoning ability of the five indicators only provides reasons for several solutions and cannot check the validity of an argument and draw appropriate conclusions. Abstrak Mempelajari geometri dapat menumbuh kembangkan kemampuan dalam bernalar atau berpikir logis memecahkan masalah berkaitan dengan pernyataan bentuk, ukuran posisi relatif gambar, dan sifat ruang. Penalaran matematis adalah daya pikir siswa dalam menarik kesimpulan sesuatu dan ranah kognitif matematis paling tinggi. Siswa tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama kesulitan dalam penalaran matematis pada tahapan penarikan kesimpulan. Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan tujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Subjek penelitian kelas VIII A UPT SMP Negeri 22 Gresik terdiri dari tiga siswa gaya kognitif Field Dependent dan tiga siswa gaya kognitif Field Independent. Analisis data peneliti dari hasil tes tertulis dan wawancara instrumen penalaran matematis kekongruenan dan kesebangunan bangun datar dan Van Hiele Geometry Test. Hasil penelitian hubungan antara tahapan tingkat berpikir geometri dan indikator kemampuan penalaran matematis dua siswa tingkat 1 visualisasi memenuhi tiga indikator; dua siswa tingkat 2 analisis memenuhi tiga indikator; dan dua siswa tingkat 3 abstraksi deduksi informal memenuhi lima indikator. Kemampuan penalaran matematis rata – rata dari lima indikator hanya pada memberikan alasan terhadap beberapa solusi dan belum dapat memeriksa kesahihan suatu argumen dan menarik kesimpulan yang tepat.

Postulat Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan MatematikaVol. 5(1)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.