Novel imaging techniques for tumor margin detection in basal cell carcinoma: a systematic scoping review of FDA and EMA‐approved imaging modalities

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for removing basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) due to its ability to guarantee 100% margin evaluation through frozen section histopathology, offering the highest cure rate among current treatments. However, noninvasive imaging technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to clinical assessment for defining presurgical margins. This systematic scoping review examines the efficacy of these imaging modalities, focusing on those approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A systematic search of EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Public Library databases identified 11 relevant studies out of 2123 records, encompassing 644 lesions across five imaging techniques. The findings suggest that dermoscopy, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), line-field optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT), and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) show potential in detecting BCC margins, which could enhance MMS by providing better preoperative planning, informing patients of expected defect size, aiding in reconstruction decisions, and reducing overall procedure costs. This review discusses the benefits and limitations of each technique, offering insights into how these innovations could influence the future of BCC management. Emerging imaging techniques could enhance MMS by improving BCC margin assessment and reducing costs. Their adoption will depend on price and ease of use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Dermatology
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17496
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel imaging techniques for tumor margin detection in basal cell carcinoma: a systematic scoping review of FDA and EMA‐approved imaging modalities

Szabolcs Bozsányi, Carmen Cantisani, Mariano Suppa, András Bánvölgyi et al.
17 citations
International Journal of Dermatology
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
6.57
article

Novel imaging techniques for tumor margin detection in basal cell carcinoma: a systematic scoping review of FDA and EMA‐approved imaging modalities

Szabolcs Bozsányi, Carmen Cantisani, Mariano Suppa, András Bánvölgyi, Mehdi Boostani, Kende Lőrincz, Norbert Kiss, Norbert Wikonkál, Kimberly L. Brady, Wendy J. Huss, György Paragh, Péter Holló
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for removing basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) due to its ability to guarantee 100% margin evaluation through frozen section histopathology, offering the highest cure rate among current treatments. However, noninvasive imaging technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to clinical assessment for defining presurgical margins. This systematic scoping review examines the efficacy of these imaging modalities, focusing on those approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A systematic search of EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Public Library databases identified 11 relevant studies out of 2123 records, encompassing 644 lesions across five imaging techniques. The findings suggest that dermoscopy, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), line-field optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT), and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) show potential in detecting BCC margins, which could enhance MMS by providing better preoperative planning, informing patients of expected defect size, aiding in reconstruction decisions, and reducing overall procedure costs. This review discusses the benefits and limitations of each technique, offering insights into how these innovations could influence the future of BCC management. Emerging imaging techniques could enhance MMS by improving BCC margin assessment and reducing costs. Their adoption will depend on price and ease of use.

International Journal of DermatologyVol. 64(2)
Semmelweis University (HU), Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Institut Jules Bordet (BE), Erasmus Hospital (BE), Société Française de Cardiologie (FR), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Roswell Park Alliance Foundation, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Semmelweis Egyetem, Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium, Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
6.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.