Total numbers of embryos lost during in-vitro fertilization

The objective of this study is to investigate the number of lost, viable embryos during Assisted Reproductive Treatments (ART), particularly in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The polarizing debate defining the beginning of human life presents the possibility of criminality associated with ART. Data from the CDC’s ART database spanning 1996-2020 was categorized into donor and non-donor, frozen and fresh, by state and by maternal age. In total, there were 2.6 million lost viable embryos across the years studied, making this a leading cause of death in the US, if life is legally determined to begin at conception. We defined viable as any embryo that a trained technician cleared for transfer to a woman’s uterus. There was considerable variation in embryo loss rates across states. Fourteen states had statistically significantly higher loss rates than average, while 27 states had significantly lower (p<0.05). A stricter legal definition of personhood did not correlate with higher rates of lost embryos in that state. There were also notable discrepancies in loss rates across individual clinics for the same given year, with some clinics having a 0% loss rate and others nearing 100%. Clinic-by-clinic variation indicates that there are significant differences in technique and experience and that traveling across state lines to receive reproductive healthcare may be driven by both legal and clinical outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.19.3.0666
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Total numbers of embryos lost during in-vitro fertilization

Juliana Kathleen Upchurch, Robert Allen Malkin, Mary Dianke Zhao
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
article

Total numbers of embryos lost during in-vitro fertilization

Juliana Kathleen Upchurch, Robert Allen Malkin, Mary Dianke Zhao
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the number of lost, viable embryos during Assisted Reproductive Treatments (ART), particularly in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The polarizing debate defining the beginning of human life presents the possibility of criminality associated with ART. Data from the CDC’s ART database spanning 1996-2020 was categorized into donor and non-donor, frozen and fresh, by state and by maternal age. In total, there were 2.6 million lost viable embryos across the years studied, making this a leading cause of death in the US, if life is legally determined to begin at conception. We defined viable as any embryo that a trained technician cleared for transfer to a woman’s uterus. There was considerable variation in embryo loss rates across states. Fourteen states had statistically significantly higher loss rates than average, while 27 states had significantly lower (p<0.05). A stricter legal definition of personhood did not correlate with higher rates of lost embryos in that state. There were also notable discrepancies in loss rates across individual clinics for the same given year, with some clinics having a 0% loss rate and others nearing 100%. Clinic-by-clinic variation indicates that there are significant differences in technique and experience and that traveling across state lines to receive reproductive healthcare may be driven by both legal and clinical outcomes.

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health SciencesVol. 19(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.