Economic Essence of Institutional Investors

The article investigates the economic essence of institutional investors in 2 aspects: distinction from individual investors and impact on finance stability. Within the frames of the 1st aspect arguments are provided to prove the fact that the key difference between institutional investors and individual ones is the recipient of investment returns. To study the 2nd aspect Russian and overseas academic literature is analyzed, as well as acute statistics that help classify institutional investors by three categories: proportion of the share capital, investment horizon and source of capital building-up. This classification forms a basis of identifying after-effects of realizing various investors’ right to withdrawal and their impact on finance stability. The author assumes that institutional investor can be ascribed simultaneously to different types, which can increase their influence on finance stability at the expense of combining possible effects of realizing the right to withdraw. It became clear that today minority investors do not exercise serious impact on finance stability, however, they can intensify the impact of majority shareholders (especially institutional investors) on corporate sector of finance market in drag-along and tag-along conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-5-122-129
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Essence of Institutional Investors

Р. О. Восканян
Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Private Equity and Venture Capital
article

Economic Essence of Institutional Investors

Р. О. Восканян
article en

Abstract

The article investigates the economic essence of institutional investors in 2 aspects: distinction from individual investors and impact on finance stability. Within the frames of the 1st aspect arguments are provided to prove the fact that the key difference between institutional investors and individual ones is the recipient of investment returns. To study the 2nd aspect Russian and overseas academic literature is analyzed, as well as acute statistics that help classify institutional investors by three categories: proportion of the share capital, investment horizon and source of capital building-up. This classification forms a basis of identifying after-effects of realizing various investors’ right to withdrawal and their impact on finance stability. The author assumes that institutional investor can be ascribed simultaneously to different types, which can increase their influence on finance stability at the expense of combining possible effects of realizing the right to withdraw. It became clear that today minority investors do not exercise serious impact on finance stability, however, they can intensify the impact of majority shareholders (especially institutional investors) on corporate sector of finance market in drag-along and tag-along conditions.

Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics(5)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Economic Essence of Institutional Investors — Р. О. Восканян · Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS