FACTORS SHAPING CORPORATE SOCIAL DISCLOSURE PRACTICES: EVIDENCE FROM THE SAUDI ARABIAN CONTEXT

This research investigates factors influencing corporate social disclosure (CSD) within the context of Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it examines how corporate governance attributes and company characteristics impact the extent of CSD. The study utilizes data from 435 firm-year observations spanning 87 companies listed on Saudi Exchange (Tadawul) during 2015-2019. CSD levels are gauged using an unweighted disclosure index derived from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. The results reveal a negative effect of board size on CSD, suggesting that smaller boards may encourage more comprehensive disclosures. Conversely, the effects of board independence and audit committee independence are insignificant. In line with theoretical predictions, larger, profitable, manufacturing companies, as well as those involved in international operations, tend to disclose more social information. The current research contributes to the literature, addressing conflicting findings on the effects of board characteristics and profitability, and exploring the underexplored roles of audit committee independence and internationalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Management Review
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2024.mmr.13
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FACTORS SHAPING CORPORATE SOCIAL DISCLOSURE PRACTICES: EVIDENCE FROM THE SAUDI ARABIAN CONTEXT

Ilyes Charchafa, Bilal Kimouche
Modern Management Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

FACTORS SHAPING CORPORATE SOCIAL DISCLOSURE PRACTICES: EVIDENCE FROM THE SAUDI ARABIAN CONTEXT

Ilyes Charchafa, Bilal Kimouche
article en

Abstract

This research investigates factors influencing corporate social disclosure (CSD) within the context of Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it examines how corporate governance attributes and company characteristics impact the extent of CSD. The study utilizes data from 435 firm-year observations spanning 87 companies listed on Saudi Exchange (Tadawul) during 2015-2019. CSD levels are gauged using an unweighted disclosure index derived from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. The results reveal a negative effect of board size on CSD, suggesting that smaller boards may encourage more comprehensive disclosures. Conversely, the effects of board independence and audit committee independence are insignificant. In line with theoretical predictions, larger, profitable, manufacturing companies, as well as those involved in international operations, tend to disclose more social information. The current research contributes to the literature, addressing conflicting findings on the effects of board characteristics and profitability, and exploring the underexplored roles of audit committee independence and internationalization.

Modern Management ReviewVol. 29(3)
University Ferhat Abbas of Setif (DZ), University of Skikda (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

FACTORS SHAPING CORPORATE SOCIAL DISCLOSURE PRACTICES: EVIDENCE FROM THE SAUDI ARABIAN CONTEXT — Ilyes Charchafa, Bilal Kimouche · Modern Management Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS