Cement-Formation Debonding Due to Temperature Variation in Geothermal Wells: An Intensive Numerical Simulation Assessment

Geothermal wells are subjected to higher loads compared to conventional oil and gas wells due to the thermal cycles that occur during both production and non-production phases. These temperature variations can affect the cohesion of the cement within the formation and casing, creating micro-annuli channels that can ultimately compromise the integrity of the well. Therefore, this study employs an intensive finite element methodology to analyze the debonding criteria of casing–cement systems in geothermal wells by examining over 36 independent models. The wellbore cooling and heating processes were simulated using three cohesive zone models (CZM): Type I (tensile), Type II (shear), and mixed (Type I and II simultaneously). The analysis revealed that Type I debonding occurs first during cooling at a temperature of around 10 °C, while Type II is the primary failure mode during heating. Evaluations of interfacial bonding shear strength (IBSS) values indicated that the debonding of the cement would even occur at high IBSS values (3 and 4 MPa) at a differential temperature of 300 °C, while the other IBSS of 1 MPa withstands only 60 °C. However, achieving an IBSS of 4 MPa with current technology is highly unlikely. Therefore, geothermal well operation and construction must be modified to keep the differential temperature below the critical temperature at which the debonding of the cement initiates. The study also found that debonding during cooling happens at lower differential temperatures due to generally lower values for interfacial bonding tensile strength (IBTS), typically less than 1 MPa. The novelty of the study is that it provides new insights into how specific temperatures trigger different types of debonding, highlights that high IBSS values may not prevent debonding at high differential temperatures, and recommends operational adjustments to maintain temperatures below critical levels to enhance cement integrity. Additionally, this study reveals that debonding during cooling occurs at a lower differential temperature change due to the reduced value of the interfacial bonding tensile strength (IBTS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17194953
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cement-Formation Debonding Due to Temperature Variation in Geothermal Wells: An Intensive Numerical Simulation Assessment

Ionuţ Lambrescu, Khizar Abid, Cătălin Teodoriu
5 citations
Energies
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.68
article

Cement-Formation Debonding Due to Temperature Variation in Geothermal Wells: An Intensive Numerical Simulation Assessment

Ionuţ Lambrescu, Khizar Abid, Cătălin Teodoriu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Geothermal wells are subjected to higher loads compared to conventional oil and gas wells due to the thermal cycles that occur during both production and non-production phases. These temperature variations can affect the cohesion of the cement within the formation and casing, creating micro-annuli channels that can ultimately compromise the integrity of the well. Therefore, this study employs an intensive finite element methodology to analyze the debonding criteria of casing–cement systems in geothermal wells by examining over 36 independent models. The wellbore cooling and heating processes were simulated using three cohesive zone models (CZM): Type I (tensile), Type II (shear), and mixed (Type I and II simultaneously). The analysis revealed that Type I debonding occurs first during cooling at a temperature of around 10 °C, while Type II is the primary failure mode during heating. Evaluations of interfacial bonding shear strength (IBSS) values indicated that the debonding of the cement would even occur at high IBSS values (3 and 4 MPa) at a differential temperature of 300 °C, while the other IBSS of 1 MPa withstands only 60 °C. However, achieving an IBSS of 4 MPa with current technology is highly unlikely. Therefore, geothermal well operation and construction must be modified to keep the differential temperature below the critical temperature at which the debonding of the cement initiates. The study also found that debonding during cooling happens at lower differential temperatures due to generally lower values for interfacial bonding tensile strength (IBTS), typically less than 1 MPa. The novelty of the study is that it provides new insights into how specific temperatures trigger different types of debonding, highlights that high IBSS values may not prevent debonding at high differential temperatures, and recommends operational adjustments to maintain temperatures below critical levels to enhance cement integrity. Additionally, this study reveals that debonding during cooling occurs at a lower differential temperature change due to the reduced value of the interfacial bonding tensile strength (IBTS).

EnergiesVol. 17(19)
Petroleum & Gas University of Ploieşti (RO), University of Oklahoma (US)
University of Oklahoma
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.