Assessment of New Techniques for Measuring Volume in Large Wood Chip Piles

Our work aimed to compare the chip pile volumes calculated by laser ground scanning, UAV technology, and laser ground measurement and also to determine the accuracy, speed, and economic efficiency of each method. The large chip pile was measured in seven different ways: band measurement, laser measurement with Vertex, global navigation satellite system, handheld mobile laser scanner, terrestrial laser scanner, drone, and smartphone with a light detection and ranging sensor. All the methods were compared in terms of accuracy, price, user-friendliness, and time required to obtain results. The calculated pile volume, depending on the method, varied from 2588 to 3362 m3. The most accurate results were provided by the terrestrial laser scanning method, which, however, was the most expensive and the most demanding in terms of collecting and evaluating the results. From a time and economic point of view, the most effective methods were UAVs and smartphones with LiDAR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101747
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of New Techniques for Measuring Volume in Large Wood Chip Piles

Miloš Gejdoš, Daniel Tomčík, Jozef Výbošťok, Juliána Chudá et al.
1 citations
Forests
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
article

Assessment of New Techniques for Measuring Volume in Large Wood Chip Piles

Miloš Gejdoš, Daniel Tomčík, Jozef Výbošťok, Juliána Chudá, Tomáš Gergeľ, Martin Lieskovský, Matej Masný, Michal Skladan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our work aimed to compare the chip pile volumes calculated by laser ground scanning, UAV technology, and laser ground measurement and also to determine the accuracy, speed, and economic efficiency of each method. The large chip pile was measured in seven different ways: band measurement, laser measurement with Vertex, global navigation satellite system, handheld mobile laser scanner, terrestrial laser scanner, drone, and smartphone with a light detection and ranging sensor. All the methods were compared in terms of accuracy, price, user-friendliness, and time required to obtain results. The calculated pile volume, depending on the method, varied from 2588 to 3362 m3. The most accurate results were provided by the terrestrial laser scanning method, which, however, was the most expensive and the most demanding in terms of collecting and evaluating the results. From a time and economic point of view, the most effective methods were UAVs and smartphones with LiDAR.

ForestsVol. 15(10)
Technická univerzita vo Zvolene (SK), National Forest Centre (SK), Matej Bel University (SK)
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja, Kultúrna a Edukacná Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.