Robotic female artificial urinary sphincter implantation vs. male artificial urinary sphincter implantation for non-neurogenic stress urinary incontinence
Robotic female AUS implantation is associated with better functional outcomes than male AUS implantation, with similar morbidity and survival rates.
Authors
- A. Manunta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2771-2190)
- Imad Bentellis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-6409)
- M. El-Akri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-3627)
- C. Haudebert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-0030)
- Valentine Lethuillier
- L. Freton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-1952)
- Alexandre Dubois (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2650-7187)
- J. Hascoët (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-4124)
- B. Peyronnet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-2825)
- Claire Richard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-5665)
Institutions
- Saint Laurent Polyclinique (FR)
- Clinique Mutualiste La Sagesse (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- World Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2024-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05238-0
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.47
Funders
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes