How transformative is agroecological knowledge co-creation? Insights from a systematic literature review

Knowledge co-creation (KCC) is imperative for agroecological development, yet the extent to which agroecological KCC pro- cesses balance scientific rigor, local relevance, and legitimacy, and the extent to which they connect to transformative agroe- cological farming remains poorly understood. Therefore, we systematically reviewed 58 peer-reviewed empirical studies that involved agroecological KCC. While we did not find a connection between the perceived credibility, salience, and legitimacy of the co-created knowledge and impacts on agroe- cological farming, we did find that KCC processes had mostly incremental, rather than transformative, impacts. We conclude that an increased focus on agroecological principles, going beyond agroecological practices, is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2024.2405885
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How transformative is agroecological knowledge co-creation? Insights from a systematic literature review

D.L.T. Hegger, Pablo Tittonell, Hens Runhaar, Laura Bello Cartagena
4 citations
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.70
article

How transformative is agroecological knowledge co-creation? Insights from a systematic literature review

D.L.T. Hegger, Pablo Tittonell, Hens Runhaar, Laura Bello Cartagena
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Knowledge co-creation (KCC) is imperative for agroecological development, yet the extent to which agroecological KCC pro- cesses balance scientific rigor, local relevance, and legitimacy, and the extent to which they connect to transformative agroe- cological farming remains poorly understood. Therefore, we systematically reviewed 58 peer-reviewed empirical studies that involved agroecological KCC. While we did not find a connection between the perceived credibility, salience, and legitimacy of the co-created knowledge and impacts on agroe- cological farming, we did find that KCC processes had mostly incremental, rather than transformative, impacts. We conclude that an increased focus on agroecological principles, going beyond agroecological practices, is needed.

Agroecology and Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 49(1)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), University of Groningen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Université de Montpellier (FR), Agroécologie (FR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How transformative is agroecological knowledge co-creation? Insights from a systematic literature review — D.L.T. Hegger, Pablo Tittonell, et al. · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS