Scientific Justification of the Rule-Making Initiative of Federal Executive Authorities

Ignoring the significance of the role of science and the scientific substantiation of rule-making initiatives of federal executive authorities is fraught with defects and poor quality of the created legal norms, which ultimately affects the state of legal regulation of specific life situations. Drawing attention to the importance of intensifying the scientific component in rule-making, the article attempts to identify some of the weaknesses of this process, on the one hand, and the advantages, on the other. As a result, based on the positive example of the implementation of the rule-making function by the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation, primarily the participation in it of a scientific organization and scientific personnel, the prospects for taking into account and disseminating the relevant experience to executive and administrative bodies are substantiated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative law and procedure
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2024-9-39-46
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific Justification of the Rule-Making Initiative of Federal Executive Authorities

Maryam V. Anisiforova, Olga I. Tsokolova
Administrative law and procedure
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

Scientific Justification of the Rule-Making Initiative of Federal Executive Authorities

Maryam V. Anisiforova, Olga I. Tsokolova
article en

Abstract

Ignoring the significance of the role of science and the scientific substantiation of rule-making initiatives of federal executive authorities is fraught with defects and poor quality of the created legal norms, which ultimately affects the state of legal regulation of specific life situations. Drawing attention to the importance of intensifying the scientific component in rule-making, the article attempts to identify some of the weaknesses of this process, on the one hand, and the advantages, on the other. As a result, based on the positive example of the implementation of the rule-making function by the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation, primarily the participation in it of a scientific organization and scientific personnel, the prospects for taking into account and disseminating the relevant experience to executive and administrative bodies are substantiated.

Administrative law and procedure
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scientific Justification of the Rule-Making Initiative of Federal Executive Authorities — Maryam V. Anisiforova, Olga I. Tsokolova · Administrative law and procedure (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS