Blast-Induced Progressive Collapse Analysis: Accounting for Initial Conditions and Damage

The paper presents the progressive collapse analysis of structures, focusing on the impact of the initial conditions (particularly initial velocity) and the damage. It proposes a method that calculates the residual axial load capacity and damage of columns based on their strain profile and considers the effects of multiple blast locations. The methodology involves the conventional design of a three-story moment-resisting frame, selecting blast parameters, calculating blast pressures, and performing structural and progressive collapse analyses. The findings reveal that the Alternate Load Path Method (APM) overestimates the capacity compared to a benchmark blast–structure interaction analysis, especially when unsuitable initial conditions and damage properties are used. To address this limitation, the paper concludes the recommendations for incorporating appropriate initial conditions and damage considerations for a relatively accurate progressive collapse analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Mechanics
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech5040038
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blast-Induced Progressive Collapse Analysis: Accounting for Initial Conditions and Damage

Girum Urgessa, Bedilu Habte, Benyam Melkeneh
Applied Mechanics
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Blast-Induced Progressive Collapse Analysis: Accounting for Initial Conditions and Damage

Girum Urgessa, Bedilu Habte, Benyam Melkeneh
article en

Abstract

The paper presents the progressive collapse analysis of structures, focusing on the impact of the initial conditions (particularly initial velocity) and the damage. It proposes a method that calculates the residual axial load capacity and damage of columns based on their strain profile and considers the effects of multiple blast locations. The methodology involves the conventional design of a three-story moment-resisting frame, selecting blast parameters, calculating blast pressures, and performing structural and progressive collapse analyses. The findings reveal that the Alternate Load Path Method (APM) overestimates the capacity compared to a benchmark blast–structure interaction analysis, especially when unsuitable initial conditions and damage properties are used. To address this limitation, the paper concludes the recommendations for incorporating appropriate initial conditions and damage considerations for a relatively accurate progressive collapse analysis.

Applied MechanicsVol. 5(4)
George Mason University (US), Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.