Ethical considerations in research when building predictive risk modelling in child and family welfare

This article presents and discusses ethical issues and implications in research when building a predictive risk model for potential use in Danish child and family welfare. The idea is to build a predictive risk model in order to study whether such a model can be valuable to child and family welfare services in the assessment of risk – aimed specifically at the decision-making process regarding notifications. Based on a framework developed especially for this field, we present and discuss ethical considerations, reflections and actions in relation to four main ethical principles: non-maleficence, autonomy, justice and explicability. We hope that our reflections on these ethical challenges can inspire research – and potentially also the field of practice when taking a deep dive into the difficult field of digitalization in social work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Social Work
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v19i1.619
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical considerations in research when building predictive risk modelling in child and family welfare

Liesanth Yde Nirmalarajan, Michael Rosholm, Anne Marie Villumsen, Simon Tranberg Bodilsen et al.
2 citations
Journal of Comparative Social Work
Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
1.29
article

Ethical considerations in research when building predictive risk modelling in child and family welfare

Liesanth Yde Nirmalarajan, Michael Rosholm, Anne Marie Villumsen, Simon Tranberg Bodilsen, Line Berg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article presents and discusses ethical issues and implications in research when building a predictive risk model for potential use in Danish child and family welfare. The idea is to build a predictive risk model in order to study whether such a model can be valuable to child and family welfare services in the assessment of risk – aimed specifically at the decision-making process regarding notifications. Based on a framework developed especially for this field, we present and discuss ethical considerations, reflections and actions in relation to four main ethical principles: non-maleficence, autonomy, justice and explicability. We hope that our reflections on these ethical challenges can inspire research – and potentially also the field of practice when taking a deep dive into the difficult field of digitalization in social work.

Journal of Comparative Social WorkVol. 19(1)
Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus Business College (DK), Troitsk Institute for Innovation and Fusion Research (RU), Trøndelag Forskning og Utvikling (Norway) (NO), VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical considerations in research when building predictive risk modelling in child and family welfare — Liesanth Yde Nirmalarajan, Michael Rosholm, et al. · Journal of Comparative Social Work (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS