Cross-context equivalence and agreement of healthy diet metrics for national and global monitoring: a multicountry analysis of cross-sectional quantitative 24-hour dietary intake studies
Composite metrics weighting both healthy and unhealthy food groups have limited cross-context equivalence, because a wide range of diets can theoretically return similar scores. Healthy food group (sub)metrics performed comparably, likely indicating strong underlying construct validity (i.e., dietary diversity and nutrient adequacy). For national and global monitoring, refinement and validation of unhealthy food group metrics (i.e., moderation) is recommended to complement healthy food group metrics.
Authors
- Giles Hanley‐Cook (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-594X)
- Victoria Padula de Quadros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0562-6937)
- Simone Michelle Gie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7812-2567)
- Lynnette M. Neufeld (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-9108)
- Sara Hoogerwerf
- Juan Pablo Parraguez
- Agnieszka Balcerzak
- Bridget Holmes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-3025)
Institutions
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2024-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.07.010
- Citations
- 17
- Primary Topic
- Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.23