Closing the Gender Gap? A Cohort Comparison of Adolescent Responses to and Attitudes Toward Pornography, 2004 vs. 2021

Pornography has become increasingly prevalent and normalized within society, raising questions about how today's adolescents might differ in their responses to and attitudes toward pornography compared to earlier generations. This study begins to fill this gap by comparing cross-sectional data from two cohorts of high school students in Sweden in 2004 (<i>n</i> = 4,266, mean age = 18.15, <i>SD</i> = 0.74, 53.9% girls) and 2020-21 (<i>n</i> = 3,256, mean age = 18.20, <i>SD</i> = 0.61, 55.4% girls). Gender-stratified bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were performed to examine the impact of survey year on outcomes. Results reveal an increase in frequent pornography use among both genders and a narrowing of the gender gap in responses and attitudes by 2020-21. Boys reported decreased arousal responses, fewer positive emotional responses, and were less inclined to imitate the behaviors seen in pornography. Girls were less averse to and upset by the pornography they encountered. Both genders became more tolerant of pornography, yet more critical of its purported benefits. Notable gender differences remain, especially with girls being more likely to recognize pornography as degrading and exploitative. These findings underscore the need for educational strategies that foster critical understandings of pornography and its societal impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2408269
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closing the Gender Gap? A Cohort Comparison of Adolescent Responses to and Attitudes Toward Pornography, 2004 vs. 2021

Linda Sofia Jonsson, Carl Göran Svedin, Inga Dennhag, Marie Bladh et al.
4 citations
The Journal of Sex Research
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
2.56
article

Closing the Gender Gap? A Cohort Comparison of Adolescent Responses to and Attitudes Toward Pornography, 2004 vs. 2021

Linda Sofia Jonsson, Carl Göran Svedin, Inga Dennhag, Marie Bladh, Åsa Landberg, Meghan Donevan, Gisela Priebe
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Pornography has become increasingly prevalent and normalized within society, raising questions about how today's adolescents might differ in their responses to and attitudes toward pornography compared to earlier generations. This study begins to fill this gap by comparing cross-sectional data from two cohorts of high school students in Sweden in 2004 (<i>n</i> = 4,266, mean age = 18.15, <i>SD</i> = 0.74, 53.9% girls) and 2020-21 (<i>n</i> = 3,256, mean age = 18.20, <i>SD</i> = 0.61, 55.4% girls). Gender-stratified bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were performed to examine the impact of survey year on outcomes. Results reveal an increase in frequent pornography use among both genders and a narrowing of the gender gap in responses and attitudes by 2020-21. Boys reported decreased arousal responses, fewer positive emotional responses, and were less inclined to imitate the behaviors seen in pornography. Girls were less averse to and upset by the pornography they encountered. Both genders became more tolerant of pornography, yet more critical of its purported benefits. Notable gender differences remain, especially with girls being more likely to recognize pornography as degrading and exploitative. These findings underscore the need for educational strategies that foster critical understandings of pornography and its societal impact.

The Journal of Sex Research
Linköping University (SE), Karlstad University (SE), Marie Cederschiöld University (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Socialdepartementet
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
2.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.