Incidence and Predictors of Anemia Among Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Introduction: The burden of anemia during pregnancy is a global concern in the field of healthcare. Struggling economies such as Iraq are the most affected by this burden. The actual instances of anemia differ depending on the underlying socio-demographic factors. Nonetheless, anemia in pregnancy is one of the causes of poor health and mortality, especially for pregnant women. Methodology: A cross sectional analysis was used among 153 pregnant women and 153 non-pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Kurdistan region, Iraq. The dependent variable used in the study was the occurrence of anemia during pregnancy via the levels of Hb, RBC, MCV, and MCH. Data was gathered using questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Blood sample data was also collected to test the levels of the four parameters (Hb, RBC, MCV, and MCH). Statistical analysis was applied in determining the occurrence of anemia, with logistics regression being perform using IBM Statistics to determine the triggers of anemia during pregnancy. Results: The descriptive statistics for pregnant women, found that the mean and standard deviations for key blood parameters are: Hb (M=12.02±SD=1.330), RBC (M=4.26±SD=0.522), MCV (M=82.91±SD=8.151), and MCH (M=28.43±SD=4.638). The normal/abnormal categories, the results were as follows: RBC (normal = 96.1%, abnormal = 3.9%), Hb (normal = 64.1%, abnormal = 35.9%), MCV (normal = 85%, abnormal = 15%), and MCH (normal = 86.9%, abnormal = 13.1%). Furthermore, the descriptive statistics for non-pregnant women, found that the mean and standard deviations for key blood parameters are: Hb (M=13.23±SD=0.937), RBC (M=4.59±SD=0.367), MCV (M=83.65±SD=2.978), and MCH (M=29.19±SD=1.430).The normal/abnormal categories, the results were as follows: RBC (normal = 97.4%, abnormal = 2.6%), Hb (normal = 75.8%, abnormal = 24.2%), MCV (normal = 90.8%, abnormal = 9.2%), and MCH (normal = 90.10%, abnormal = 9.90%). Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the results for pregnant and non-pregnant women in the mean blood parameters (MCV, MCH, Hb, and RBC) during pregnancy. Specifically, the study found that the level of Hb varies significantly between the two study participants. Hb scores are also higher among non-pregnant women than pregnant women. Additionally, RBC, MCV, and MCH levels are higher for non-pregnant women than for pregnant women. Anemia is linked with factors such as occupation, age, obstetrical history of stillbirth, abortion, parity, and gravity on the potential of developing anemia during pregnancy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Technium BioChemMed
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47577/biochemmed.v9i.11736
Primary Topic
Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence and Predictors of Anemia Among Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Himan I. Ali, Leva Hazim, Shana Ahmad, Balqees Ibrahim et al.
Technium BioChemMed
Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
article

Incidence and Predictors of Anemia Among Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Himan I. Ali, Leva Hazim, Shana Ahmad, Balqees Ibrahim, Aronk Rasheed
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The burden of anemia during pregnancy is a global concern in the field of healthcare. Struggling economies such as Iraq are the most affected by this burden. The actual instances of anemia differ depending on the underlying socio-demographic factors. Nonetheless, anemia in pregnancy is one of the causes of poor health and mortality, especially for pregnant women. Methodology: A cross sectional analysis was used among 153 pregnant women and 153 non-pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Kurdistan region, Iraq. The dependent variable used in the study was the occurrence of anemia during pregnancy via the levels of Hb, RBC, MCV, and MCH. Data was gathered using questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Blood sample data was also collected to test the levels of the four parameters (Hb, RBC, MCV, and MCH). Statistical analysis was applied in determining the occurrence of anemia, with logistics regression being perform using IBM Statistics to determine the triggers of anemia during pregnancy. Results: The descriptive statistics for pregnant women, found that the mean and standard deviations for key blood parameters are: Hb (M=12.02±SD=1.330), RBC (M=4.26±SD=0.522), MCV (M=82.91±SD=8.151), and MCH (M=28.43±SD=4.638). The normal/abnormal categories, the results were as follows: RBC (normal = 96.1%, abnormal = 3.9%), Hb (normal = 64.1%, abnormal = 35.9%), MCV (normal = 85%, abnormal = 15%), and MCH (normal = 86.9%, abnormal = 13.1%). Furthermore, the descriptive statistics for non-pregnant women, found that the mean and standard deviations for key blood parameters are: Hb (M=13.23±SD=0.937), RBC (M=4.59±SD=0.367), MCV (M=83.65±SD=2.978), and MCH (M=29.19±SD=1.430).The normal/abnormal categories, the results were as follows: RBC (normal = 97.4%, abnormal = 2.6%), Hb (normal = 75.8%, abnormal = 24.2%), MCV (normal = 90.8%, abnormal = 9.2%), and MCH (normal = 90.10%, abnormal = 9.90%). Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the results for pregnant and non-pregnant women in the mean blood parameters (MCV, MCH, Hb, and RBC) during pregnancy. Specifically, the study found that the level of Hb varies significantly between the two study participants. Hb scores are also higher among non-pregnant women than pregnant women. Additionally, RBC, MCV, and MCH levels are higher for non-pregnant women than for pregnant women. Anemia is linked with factors such as occupation, age, obstetrical history of stillbirth, abortion, parity, and gravity on the potential of developing anemia during pregnancy.

Technium BioChemMedVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.