Digital Sovereignty, the Private Sector, and a Social Republican Alternative

Abstract The European Union has stated the ambition to regain control over the digital sphere, which academics have construed as both a push for digital sovereignty and as a form of digital constitutionalism. The strategy promises to be an improvement over the previous period of digital liberalism. I suggest, however, from a republican perspective, that this strategy of digital sovereignty is not sufficiently critical of the reliance on the private sector. A dominant private sector comes with a risk of widespread infrastructural dependency and yields too much of the digital sphere to a way of thinking that is shaped in accordance with silicon valley companies. On a republican account, these are arguably forms of structural domination. To prevent these risks from materialising, the European strategy should instead emphasize the role of alternative ownership models, such as those found in the digital commons and in public service media organisations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Society
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00140-z
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Sovereignty, the Private Sector, and a Social Republican Alternative

Bernd Hoeksema
6 citations
Digital Society
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
13.39
article

Digital Sovereignty, the Private Sector, and a Social Republican Alternative

Bernd Hoeksema
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The European Union has stated the ambition to regain control over the digital sphere, which academics have construed as both a push for digital sovereignty and as a form of digital constitutionalism. The strategy promises to be an improvement over the previous period of digital liberalism. I suggest, however, from a republican perspective, that this strategy of digital sovereignty is not sufficiently critical of the reliance on the private sector. A dominant private sector comes with a risk of widespread infrastructural dependency and yields too much of the digital sphere to a way of thinking that is shaped in accordance with silicon valley companies. On a republican account, these are arguably forms of structural domination. To prevent these risks from materialising, the European strategy should instead emphasize the role of alternative ownership models, such as those found in the digital commons and in public service media organisations.

Digital SocietyVol. 3(3)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Sovereignty, the Private Sector, and a Social Republican Alternative — Bernd Hoeksema · Digital Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS