Assessing and mitigating environmental impacts of construction materials: Insights from environmental product declarations

Construction activities significantly impact natural resources and the environment, accounting for 40 % of global energy consumption and 36 % of carbon emissions. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of various primary construction materials by leveraging more original and comprehensive Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and incorporates insights from prevvious research to summarize effective mitigation strategies. Analyzing the environmental impact per unit mass is a critical step toward building-level assessments, enabling the strategic replacement of high-pollution materials with lower-impact alternatives to optimize environmental outcomes. The quantitative analysis of data from 180 EPDs indicates that aluminum and steel have the highest median total environmental impacts per unit mass, followed by plastics, while wood, cement, and concrete have relatively lower impacts. Overall, Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP) are identified as the primary environmental impacts of construction materials. At the building level, the environmental footprint varies based on the quantity of each material used, leading to substantial overall impacts. Furthermore, this study explores the relationships between different environmental impacts, finding positive correlations between GWP and Primary Energy Non-Renewable Energy (PENRE), Acidification Potential (AP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). A comprehensive literature review identifies the key environmental hotspots and mitigation strategies for high-impact materials such as aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. Common strategies include innovative production methods, waste recycling, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and the development of low-carbon materials. By integrating quantitative EPDs analysis with a qualitative literature review, this research provides a holistic understanding of the environmental burdens of construction materials, offering a valuable framework for developing sustainable policies and practices within the construction industry. • Comparative Environmental Impact Analysis of 11 construction materials using EPDs. • Aluminum and steel exhibit the highest environmental impacts per unit mass. • Resource Depletion and Global Warming Potential are key impact indicators. • Emission reduction strategies are reviewed for aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. • Findings guide sustainable material choices in construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110929
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing and mitigating environmental impacts of construction materials: Insights from environmental product declarations

Qudsia Kanwal, Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi, Mohammed M. Al‐Humaiqani, Anissa Nurdiawati et al.
20 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
5.30
article

Assessing and mitigating environmental impacts of construction materials: Insights from environmental product declarations

Qudsia Kanwal, Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi, Mohammed M. Al‐Humaiqani, Anissa Nurdiawati, Zhonghan Yu
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Construction activities significantly impact natural resources and the environment, accounting for 40 % of global energy consumption and 36 % of carbon emissions. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of various primary construction materials by leveraging more original and comprehensive Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and incorporates insights from prevvious research to summarize effective mitigation strategies. Analyzing the environmental impact per unit mass is a critical step toward building-level assessments, enabling the strategic replacement of high-pollution materials with lower-impact alternatives to optimize environmental outcomes. The quantitative analysis of data from 180 EPDs indicates that aluminum and steel have the highest median total environmental impacts per unit mass, followed by plastics, while wood, cement, and concrete have relatively lower impacts. Overall, Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP) are identified as the primary environmental impacts of construction materials. At the building level, the environmental footprint varies based on the quantity of each material used, leading to substantial overall impacts. Furthermore, this study explores the relationships between different environmental impacts, finding positive correlations between GWP and Primary Energy Non-Renewable Energy (PENRE), Acidification Potential (AP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). A comprehensive literature review identifies the key environmental hotspots and mitigation strategies for high-impact materials such as aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. Common strategies include innovative production methods, waste recycling, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and the development of low-carbon materials. By integrating quantitative EPDs analysis with a qualitative literature review, this research provides a holistic understanding of the environmental burdens of construction materials, offering a valuable framework for developing sustainable policies and practices within the construction industry. • Comparative Environmental Impact Analysis of 11 construction materials using EPDs. • Aluminum and steel exhibit the highest environmental impacts per unit mass. • Resource Depletion and Global Warming Potential are key impact indicators. • Emission reduction strategies are reviewed for aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. • Findings guide sustainable material choices in construction.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 98
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA), Renmin University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
5.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.