Cemented vs. cementless stems for reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a registry analysis with patient-reported outcomes from a level 1 trauma centre
Revision rates and mortality are similar between cemented and cementless humeral stems used for rTSA for proximal humerus fractures. For appropriate patients, cementless humeral stems may be an acceptable first-line treatment for proximal humerus fractures.
Authors
- Michael Perret (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3152-2536)
- Kyle Raubenheimer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-0700)
- William G. Blakeney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7789-5872)
- Matthew Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-1931)
- David R.J. Gill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-630X)
- Dylan Harries (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-6989)
- Stefan Bauer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-0287)
- Mitchell Atkinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-9946)
Institutions
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
- Australian Orthopaedic Association (AU)
- Hôpital de Morges (CH)
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JSES International
- Published
- 2024-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.023
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.72