WITHOUT BORDERS: AN EXEGESIS OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF IMMIGRANT EMPLOYEES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

The principal aim of this paper is to test how States implement international human rights law (IHRL) with respect to the security and welfare of immigrant employees in their country of residence. The paper explicates relevant IHRL shortcomings and contrasts them with rules applicable in situations of human rights abused of immigrant employees. This paper resolves three core questions that are specifically important to immigrant employees as follows: (1) who are considered immigrant employees under each law? Addressing this question permits the testing of whether States understands the status of immigrant employees under International Human Rights Treaty Laws, (2) How is the legal status of immigrant employees managed? (3) Are immigrant employees provided with adequate safeguard along with corresponding security in their place of residence? The outcome of this inquiry revealed that States seldomly apply IHRL understanding of the status of immigrant employees in discussing some of the notable short-comings that contributes to the challenges faced by immigrant employees in their place of residence. Driven fundamentally by efforts to eradicate harmful practices and human rights abuses on immigrant employees, yet immigrant employees are exposed to all manner of employment-related abuses and discrimination in their respective work place. Nonetheless, the paper analyzed cases of discriminatory practices against immigrant employees in UK along with Saudi Arabia. The paper explores what explicit legal and regulatory constraints impedes immigrant rights at his workplace. Moreover, it considers proper measures for managing and overcoming such impediments. The paper adopts analytical approach in its argument through a review of literatures, treaties and conventions. The paper concludes that the right of immigrant employees is universal, inalienable, indivisible and interdependent, regardless of where they are and of their status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Border Protection
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52617/jlbp.v6i1.579
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WITHOUT BORDERS: AN EXEGESIS OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF IMMIGRANT EMPLOYEES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

Uche Nnawulezi
Journal of Law and Border Protection
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

WITHOUT BORDERS: AN EXEGESIS OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF IMMIGRANT EMPLOYEES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

Uche Nnawulezi
article en

Abstract

The principal aim of this paper is to test how States implement international human rights law (IHRL) with respect to the security and welfare of immigrant employees in their country of residence. The paper explicates relevant IHRL shortcomings and contrasts them with rules applicable in situations of human rights abused of immigrant employees. This paper resolves three core questions that are specifically important to immigrant employees as follows: (1) who are considered immigrant employees under each law? Addressing this question permits the testing of whether States understands the status of immigrant employees under International Human Rights Treaty Laws, (2) How is the legal status of immigrant employees managed? (3) Are immigrant employees provided with adequate safeguard along with corresponding security in their place of residence? The outcome of this inquiry revealed that States seldomly apply IHRL understanding of the status of immigrant employees in discussing some of the notable short-comings that contributes to the challenges faced by immigrant employees in their place of residence. Driven fundamentally by efforts to eradicate harmful practices and human rights abuses on immigrant employees, yet immigrant employees are exposed to all manner of employment-related abuses and discrimination in their respective work place. Nonetheless, the paper analyzed cases of discriminatory practices against immigrant employees in UK along with Saudi Arabia. The paper explores what explicit legal and regulatory constraints impedes immigrant rights at his workplace. Moreover, it considers proper measures for managing and overcoming such impediments. The paper adopts analytical approach in its argument through a review of literatures, treaties and conventions. The paper concludes that the right of immigrant employees is universal, inalienable, indivisible and interdependent, regardless of where they are and of their status.

Journal of Law and Border ProtectionVol. 6(1)
Bowen University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.