Quantitative Evaluation of Curved BioPrinted Constructs of an <i>in Situ</i> Robotic System Towards Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss

Tissue engineering techniques and particularly <i>in situ</i> bioprinting using handheld devices and robotic systems have recently demonstrated promising outcomes to address volumetric muscle loss injuries. Nevertheless, these approaches suffer from insufficient printing precision and/or lack of quantitative analysis of the thickness and uniformity of bioprinted constructs (BPCs) - which are critical for ensuring cell viability and growth. To address these limitations, in this study, we present a framework for robotic bioprinting and complementary vision-based algorithms to quantitatively analyze thickness and uniformity of BPCs with curved geometries. The performance of the proposed robotic bioprinting and complementary algorithms has been thoroughly evaluated using various simulation and experimental studies on BPCs with constant and variable thicknesses. The results clearly demonstrate the remarkable and accurate performance of the proposed method in calculating the thickness and its variations along the geometry of the BPCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2024.3474483
Citations
6
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Curved BioPrinted Constructs of an in Situ Robotic System Towards Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss

Farshid Alambeigi, Meenakshi Kamaraj, Johnson V. John, Xinyuan Huang et al.
6 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
1.11
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Curved BioPrinted Constructs of an in Situ Robotic System Towards Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss

Farshid Alambeigi, Meenakshi Kamaraj, Johnson V. John, Xinyuan Huang, Omid Rezayof
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Tissue engineering techniques and particularly <i>in situ</i> bioprinting using handheld devices and robotic systems have recently demonstrated promising outcomes to address volumetric muscle loss injuries. Nevertheless, these approaches suffer from insufficient printing precision and/or lack of quantitative analysis of the thickness and uniformity of bioprinted constructs (BPCs) - which are critical for ensuring cell viability and growth. To address these limitations, in this study, we present a framework for robotic bioprinting and complementary vision-based algorithms to quantitatively analyze thickness and uniformity of BPCs with curved geometries. The performance of the proposed robotic bioprinting and complementary algorithms has been thoroughly evaluated using various simulation and experimental studies on BPCs with constant and variable thicknesses. The results clearly demonstrate the remarkable and accurate performance of the proposed method in calculating the thickness and its variations along the geometry of the BPCs.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 9(11)
Terasaki Foundation (US), Walker (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Institutes of Health
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantitative Evaluation of Curved BioPrinted Constructs of an <i>in Situ</i> Robotic System Towards Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss — Farshid Alambeigi, Meenakshi Kamaraj, et al. · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS