Performance and usability of cardiometabolic point of care devices in Nepal: A prospective, quantitative, accuracy study

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, represent a serious global health concern. There is an urgent need for prompt diagnosis and effective monitoring at point of care, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Here we present the results of a study assessing the quantitative accuracy of two devices that may fit the target product profile for a cardiometabolic point-of-care device. This prospective, quantitative, accuracy study (NCT05257564) was conducted between March to May 2022, investigating the performance of the JanaCare Aina Blood Monitoring System (JCAina) and the Tascom SimplexTAS 101 device (TAS101) compared with local standard laboratory methods in rural Nepal. Using fingerstick capillary blood, cardiometabolic parameters were analysed using both devices. The quantitative accuracy was compared against a local laboratory reference assay. System usability was also assessed. For JCAina, the mean absolute biases (Bland-Altman analysis) for glucose, HbA1c and total cholesterol tests were -3.87 mg/dL (95% CI: -7.52–-0.22), 1.34% (95% CI: 1.21–1.47), and -9.52 mg/dL (95% CI: -11.9–-7.2), respectively, corresponding to mean percentage biases of 2.0%, 18.5%, and -6.4%. These indicate clinically small (<10% biases) differences from laboratory results for glucose and cholesterol, and a moderate (10–20%) positive bias for HbA1c. For TAS101, the mean absolute biases for glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol and creatinine tests were 18.7 mg/dL (95% CI: 15.8–21.5), -0.2% (95% CI: -0.26–-0.14), 29.8 mg/dL (95% CI: 27.0–32.6), and -0.02 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.05–0.01), respectively, corresponding to mean percentage biases of 12.1%, -2.6%, 15.8%, and -4.5%. These indicate clinically small differences for HbA1c and creatinine, and moderate positive biases for glucose and cholesterol. Both systems exhibited usability challenges. The JCAina and TAS101 point-of-care cardiometabolic devices were shown to have promising accuracy in environmental conditions such as in Nepal, though improvements are still needed for some parameters and for ease of use. Trial registration: NCT05257564 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003760
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance and usability of cardiometabolic point of care devices in Nepal: A prospective, quantitative, accuracy study

Mamit Rai, Jorge César Correia, Sanjib Kumar Sharma, Bruno Lab et al.
2 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
1.88
article

Performance and usability of cardiometabolic point of care devices in Nepal: A prospective, quantitative, accuracy study

Mamit Rai, Jorge César Correia, Sanjib Kumar Sharma, Bruno Lab, Marina Giachino, Zoltan Pataky, Vijay Kumar Khanal, Berra Erkoşar, Sigiriya Aebischer Perone, Olivia Heller, Beatrice Vetter, Sagar Poudel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, represent a serious global health concern. There is an urgent need for prompt diagnosis and effective monitoring at point of care, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Here we present the results of a study assessing the quantitative accuracy of two devices that may fit the target product profile for a cardiometabolic point-of-care device. This prospective, quantitative, accuracy study (NCT05257564) was conducted between March to May 2022, investigating the performance of the JanaCare Aina Blood Monitoring System (JCAina) and the Tascom SimplexTAS 101 device (TAS101) compared with local standard laboratory methods in rural Nepal. Using fingerstick capillary blood, cardiometabolic parameters were analysed using both devices. The quantitative accuracy was compared against a local laboratory reference assay. System usability was also assessed. For JCAina, the mean absolute biases (Bland-Altman analysis) for glucose, HbA1c and total cholesterol tests were -3.87 mg/dL (95% CI: -7.52–-0.22), 1.34% (95% CI: 1.21–1.47), and -9.52 mg/dL (95% CI: -11.9–-7.2), respectively, corresponding to mean percentage biases of 2.0%, 18.5%, and -6.4%. These indicate clinically small (<10% biases) differences from laboratory results for glucose and cholesterol, and a moderate (10–20%) positive bias for HbA1c. For TAS101, the mean absolute biases for glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol and creatinine tests were 18.7 mg/dL (95% CI: 15.8–21.5), -0.2% (95% CI: -0.26–-0.14), 29.8 mg/dL (95% CI: 27.0–32.6), and -0.02 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.05–0.01), respectively, corresponding to mean percentage biases of 12.1%, -2.6%, 15.8%, and -4.5%. These indicate clinically small differences for HbA1c and creatinine, and moderate positive biases for glucose and cholesterol. Both systems exhibited usability challenges. The JCAina and TAS101 point-of-care cardiometabolic devices were shown to have promising accuracy in environmental conditions such as in Nepal, though improvements are still needed for some parameters and for ease of use. Trial registration: NCT05257564 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 4(10)
FIND (CH), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Hypertension Institute (US), Geneva College (US), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (NP)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.