Up for the challenge: Power motive congruence drives nurses to craft their jobs and experience well-being

Job crafting is the behavior that employees engage in to create personally better fitting work environments, for example, by increasing challenging job demands. To better understand the driving forces behind employees' engagement in job crafting, we investigated implicit and explicit power motives. While implicit motives tend to operate at the unconscious, explicit motives operate at the unconscious level. We focused on power motives, as power is an agentic motive characterized by the need to influence your environment. Although power is relevant to job crafting in its entirety, in this study, we link it to increasing challenging job demands due to its relevance to job control, which falls under the umbrella of power. Using a cross-sectional design, we collected survey data from a sample of Lebanese nurses (N = 360) working in 18 different hospitals across the country. In both implicit and explicit power motive measures, we focused on integrative power that enable people to stay calm and integrate opposition. The results showed that explicit power predicted job crafting (H1) and that implicit power amplified this effect (H2). Furthermore, job crafting mediated the relationship between congruently high power motives and positive work-related outcomes (H3) that were interrelated (H4). Our findings unravel the driving forces behind one of the most important dimensions of job crafting and extend the benefits of motive congruence to work-related outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310717
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Up for the challenge: Power motive congruence drives nurses to craft their jobs and experience well-being

Nicola Baumann, Lina Daouk‐Öyry, Athanasios Chasiotis, Rawan Ghazzawi et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Psychological Testing and Assessment
0.82
article

Up for the challenge: Power motive congruence drives nurses to craft their jobs and experience well-being

Nicola Baumann, Lina Daouk‐Öyry, Athanasios Chasiotis, Rawan Ghazzawi, Michael Bender
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Job crafting is the behavior that employees engage in to create personally better fitting work environments, for example, by increasing challenging job demands. To better understand the driving forces behind employees' engagement in job crafting, we investigated implicit and explicit power motives. While implicit motives tend to operate at the unconscious, explicit motives operate at the unconscious level. We focused on power motives, as power is an agentic motive characterized by the need to influence your environment. Although power is relevant to job crafting in its entirety, in this study, we link it to increasing challenging job demands due to its relevance to job control, which falls under the umbrella of power. Using a cross-sectional design, we collected survey data from a sample of Lebanese nurses (N = 360) working in 18 different hospitals across the country. In both implicit and explicit power motive measures, we focused on integrative power that enable people to stay calm and integrate opposition. The results showed that explicit power predicted job crafting (H1) and that implicit power amplified this effect (H2). Furthermore, job crafting mediated the relationship between congruently high power motives and positive work-related outcomes (H3) that were interrelated (H4). Our findings unravel the driving forces behind one of the most important dimensions of job crafting and extend the benefits of motive congruence to work-related outcomes.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(10)
Trier University of Applied Sciences (DE), BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Tilburg University (NL), Christian Family Service Centre (CN), Universität Trier (DE), American University of Beirut (LB)
Universität Trier
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.