Effects of long-term biodegradable film mulching on yield and water productivity of maize in North China Plain

Biodegradable films are considered ideal alternatives to polyethylene films because of their advantages in increasing crop yield and controlling soil pollution. However, the influences of biodegradable film mulching on soil physicochemical environments and water productivity after long-term mulching remain poorly understood. Therefore, a field experiment after long-term mulching (since 2016) was conducted to explore the effects of black biodegradable film (BB), transparent biodegradable film (TB), and traditional polyethylene film (PE) on soil physicochemical environments, aboveground biomass accumulation, grain yield, evapotranspiration, and water productivity (WP) of maize in the 2021 and 2022 in the North China Plain. The results showed that polyethylene films and biodegradable films had a similar ability to preserve soil moisture, promote maize growth, reduce evapotranspiration, and increase WP. Moreover, the performances of BB were more equivalent to PE, and there was no significant difference on WP and yield under BB and PE. Compared with traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), BB and PE significantly increased yield (9.5 % and 12.7 % in 2021; 5.25 % and 6.37 % in 2022) and WP (11.54 % and 21.47 % in 2021; 24.28 % and 23.42 % in 2022). Film mulching treatments increased the soil organic carbon sequestration rate, and the content of soil organic carbon, microbial activity, and urease activity in the 0–20 cm soil layer compared with CK. According to structural equation modeling, the increasing soil water storage because of films mulching positively influenced yield by enhancing enzyme activities which were related to soil nutrients. Over all, these results showed that black biodegradable film is an ideal replacement for polyethylene films under long-term mulching conditions because of its comparable agronomic performance and influence on soil physicochemical environments in the North China Plain. • Long-term biodegradable film mulching (BDM) significantly impacted soil structure. • The effects of long-term BDM on soil physicochemical environments were similar to PE. • Effects of BDM and PE on the maize production were determined after long-term mulching. • The BDM and PE increased yield through affecting soil physicochemical environments. • Agronomic performance of the black BDM was more similar to PE than transparent BDM.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109094
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of long-term biodegradable film mulching on yield and water productivity of maize in North China Plain

Mingliang Gao, Quanqi Li, Mingming Zhang, Rui Zong et al.
14 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
4.67
article

Effects of long-term biodegradable film mulching on yield and water productivity of maize in North China Plain

Mingliang Gao, Quanqi Li, Mingming Zhang, Rui Zong, Yuan Meng, Ming Li, Zhendong Liu, Xiudi Shangguan, Chitao Sun, Xin Wang
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Biodegradable films are considered ideal alternatives to polyethylene films because of their advantages in increasing crop yield and controlling soil pollution. However, the influences of biodegradable film mulching on soil physicochemical environments and water productivity after long-term mulching remain poorly understood. Therefore, a field experiment after long-term mulching (since 2016) was conducted to explore the effects of black biodegradable film (BB), transparent biodegradable film (TB), and traditional polyethylene film (PE) on soil physicochemical environments, aboveground biomass accumulation, grain yield, evapotranspiration, and water productivity (WP) of maize in the 2021 and 2022 in the North China Plain. The results showed that polyethylene films and biodegradable films had a similar ability to preserve soil moisture, promote maize growth, reduce evapotranspiration, and increase WP. Moreover, the performances of BB were more equivalent to PE, and there was no significant difference on WP and yield under BB and PE. Compared with traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), BB and PE significantly increased yield (9.5 % and 12.7 % in 2021; 5.25 % and 6.37 % in 2022) and WP (11.54 % and 21.47 % in 2021; 24.28 % and 23.42 % in 2022). Film mulching treatments increased the soil organic carbon sequestration rate, and the content of soil organic carbon, microbial activity, and urease activity in the 0–20 cm soil layer compared with CK. According to structural equation modeling, the increasing soil water storage because of films mulching positively influenced yield by enhancing enzyme activities which were related to soil nutrients. Over all, these results showed that black biodegradable film is an ideal replacement for polyethylene films under long-term mulching conditions because of its comparable agronomic performance and influence on soil physicochemical environments in the North China Plain. • Long-term biodegradable film mulching (BDM) significantly impacted soil structure. • The effects of long-term BDM on soil physicochemical environments were similar to PE. • Effects of BDM and PE on the maize production were determined after long-term mulching. • The BDM and PE increased yield through affecting soil physicochemical environments. • Agronomic performance of the black BDM was more similar to PE than transparent BDM.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 304
Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province, Department of Education of Shandong Province, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
4.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.