Misinformed about misinformation: On the polarizing discourse on misinformation and its consequences for the field

The field of misinformation is facing several challenges, from attacks on academic freedom to polarizing discourse about the nature and extent of the problem for elections and digital wellbeing. However, we see this as an inflection point and an opportunity to chart a more informed and contextual research practice. To foster credible research and informed public policy, we argue that research on misinformation should be locally focused, self-reflexive, and interdisciplinary, addressing critical questions about what counts as misinformation and why it does, the vulnerabilities of specific communities, and the sociotechnical and sociopolitical conditions that shape information interpretation. By concentrating on when and how misinformation affects society, instead of whether, the field can provide more precise insights and contribute to productive discussions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-159
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misinformed about misinformation: On the polarizing discourse on misinformation and its consequences for the field

Gabrielle Lim, Irene V. Pasquetto, Samantha Bradshaw
5 citations
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
Misinformation and Its Impacts
5.66
article

Misinformed about misinformation: On the polarizing discourse on misinformation and its consequences for the field

Gabrielle Lim, Irene V. Pasquetto, Samantha Bradshaw
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The field of misinformation is facing several challenges, from attacks on academic freedom to polarizing discourse about the nature and extent of the problem for elections and digital wellbeing. However, we see this as an inflection point and an opportunity to chart a more informed and contextual research practice. To foster credible research and informed public policy, we argue that research on misinformation should be locally focused, self-reflexive, and interdisciplinary, addressing critical questions about what counts as misinformation and why it does, the vulnerabilities of specific communities, and the sociotechnical and sociopolitical conditions that shape information interpretation. By concentrating on when and how misinformation affects society, instead of whether, the field can provide more precise insights and contribute to productive discussions.

Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
American University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Misinformed about misinformation: On the polarizing discourse on misinformation and its consequences for the field — Gabrielle Lim, Irene V. Pasquetto, et al. · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS