A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing

Abstract This historical review addresses the issues of the evaluation and testing of hydrological models, with a focus on rainfall–runoff models. After a discussion of the general philosophies of hydrological modeling, nine different philosophies of model evaluation are considered, focusing on the period of modeling on digital computers since the 1960s. In addition, some discursions to discuss the definitions of calibration and validation, how much data is needed for model calibration, equifinality and uncertainty, probabilities and possibilities, the evaluation of model ensembles, and model benchmarking. The paper finishes with a final discursion on the philosophical problem of induction. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Methods Science of Water > Hydrological Processes

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1761
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing

Keith Beven
9 citations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.81
article

A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing

Keith Beven
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract This historical review addresses the issues of the evaluation and testing of hydrological models, with a focus on rainfall–runoff models. After a discussion of the general philosophies of hydrological modeling, nine different philosophies of model evaluation are considered, focusing on the period of modeling on digital computers since the 1960s. In addition, some discursions to discuss the definitions of calibration and validation, how much data is needed for model calibration, equifinality and uncertainty, probabilities and possibilities, the evaluation of model ensembles, and model benchmarking. The paper finishes with a final discursion on the philosophical problem of induction. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Methods Science of Water > Hydrological Processes

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews WaterVol. 12(1)
Lancaster University (GB)
Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing — Keith Beven · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS