Flexural and pseudo‐ductile behavior of e‐glass uniaxial and biaxial fabric‐reinforced cementitious matrix: Experimental study and simulation

Abstract This research aims to study the flexural and pseudo‐ductile behavior of e‐glass biaxial and uniaxial fabric reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM). Also, the flexural results and load–deformation curves of FRCM samples were numerically simulated using the finite element method (FEM). The experiments were started with preparation of FRCM flexural samples with different types of fabrics (biaxial and uniaxial) and their distribution in the matrix: one layer was put in the middle, two on the top, two on the bottom, and three layers were distributed equally. The surface morphology and cross‐section microstructure of the fabricated FRCM panels and cohesion of fabrics inside of them were observed using an optical microscope. Subsequently, the flexural response of the FRCM samples was measured according to standard EN 196‐1. Afterwards, based on the flexural measurements, the pseudo‐ductile behavior of the FRCM panels in terms of the ductility index (DI) was determined using energy criteria, including Naaman and Grace models. Finally, the crack propagation and flexural load‐deformation curves of FRCM samples were numerically modeled using FEM (LS‐DYNA) to validate the experiential results. The results showed that reinforcement of mortar with glass fabric leads to a significant increase in strain, especially in case of 3 layers/FRCM till 224% (uniaxial) and 110% (biaxial). Also, the uniaxial FRCM samples provided higher flexural load (3600 N) compared with mortar panel (2337 N) and biaxial FRCM (2788 N). In addition, the DI of FRCM samples was significantly improved by embedding 3 layers of uniaxial fabrics up to 152% (Naaman) and 230% (Grace), when compared with neat panel. Finally, the numerical results obtained from FEM provided a high predication to simulate the failure mode of all panels and to model the load–deformation curves with agreement >96%. Based on that, it is highly recommended to use three layers of e‐glass uniaxial fabric to reinforce the cementitious composite and to improve its flexural response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202300634
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexural and pseudo‐ductile behavior of e‐glass uniaxial and biaxial fabric‐reinforced cementitious matrix: Experimental study and simulation

Irena Lukošiūtė, Sharath P. Subadra, Samy Yousef, Regina Kalpokaitė‐Dičkuvienė
2 citations
Structural Concrete
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
0.52
article

Flexural and pseudo‐ductile behavior of e‐glass uniaxial and biaxial fabric‐reinforced cementitious matrix: Experimental study and simulation

Irena Lukošiūtė, Sharath P. Subadra, Samy Yousef, Regina Kalpokaitė‐Dičkuvienė
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This research aims to study the flexural and pseudo‐ductile behavior of e‐glass biaxial and uniaxial fabric reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM). Also, the flexural results and load–deformation curves of FRCM samples were numerically simulated using the finite element method (FEM). The experiments were started with preparation of FRCM flexural samples with different types of fabrics (biaxial and uniaxial) and their distribution in the matrix: one layer was put in the middle, two on the top, two on the bottom, and three layers were distributed equally. The surface morphology and cross‐section microstructure of the fabricated FRCM panels and cohesion of fabrics inside of them were observed using an optical microscope. Subsequently, the flexural response of the FRCM samples was measured according to standard EN 196‐1. Afterwards, based on the flexural measurements, the pseudo‐ductile behavior of the FRCM panels in terms of the ductility index (DI) was determined using energy criteria, including Naaman and Grace models. Finally, the crack propagation and flexural load‐deformation curves of FRCM samples were numerically modeled using FEM (LS‐DYNA) to validate the experiential results. The results showed that reinforcement of mortar with glass fabric leads to a significant increase in strain, especially in case of 3 layers/FRCM till 224% (uniaxial) and 110% (biaxial). Also, the uniaxial FRCM samples provided higher flexural load (3600 N) compared with mortar panel (2337 N) and biaxial FRCM (2788 N). In addition, the DI of FRCM samples was significantly improved by embedding 3 layers of uniaxial fabrics up to 152% (Naaman) and 230% (Grace), when compared with neat panel. Finally, the numerical results obtained from FEM provided a high predication to simulate the failure mode of all panels and to model the load–deformation curves with agreement >96%. Based on that, it is highly recommended to use three layers of e‐glass uniaxial fabric to reinforce the cementitious composite and to improve its flexural response.

Structural ConcreteVol. 26(2)
Kaunas University of Technology (LT), Lithuanian Energy Institute (LT)
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.