Why Hyflex Teaching Should Not Become the New Normal in Higher Education

Hyflex teaching, in which the instructor meets face-to-face with some students while other students simultaneously join remotely, has proliferated since 2020. However, little research has investigated new problems it may create. We analyze six courses taught during the 2020–2021 academic year at a liberal arts college, five hyflex and one synchronous remote. Data include student quiz and final exam scores, participation reflections, and survey responses. We find that although hyflex courses do enable student learning and skill acquisition, students who attend only remotely tend to perform worse than those who attend face-to-face. Additionally, although hyflex and synchronous remote share some drawbacks, we find that hyflex creates new unique problems and unequal learning environments. Flexibility and accessibility are essential problems in higher education, but we argue that widespread implementation of hyflex courses is not the answer. We conclude with the limited circumstances in which hyflex could be recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching Sociology
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x241283830
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Hyflex Teaching Should Not Become the New Normal in Higher Education

A. R. Gillis, Alexandria Szabo
2 citations
Teaching Sociology
Online and Blended Learning
4.19
article

Why Hyflex Teaching Should Not Become the New Normal in Higher Education

A. R. Gillis, Alexandria Szabo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Hyflex teaching, in which the instructor meets face-to-face with some students while other students simultaneously join remotely, has proliferated since 2020. However, little research has investigated new problems it may create. We analyze six courses taught during the 2020–2021 academic year at a liberal arts college, five hyflex and one synchronous remote. Data include student quiz and final exam scores, participation reflections, and survey responses. We find that although hyflex courses do enable student learning and skill acquisition, students who attend only remotely tend to perform worse than those who attend face-to-face. Additionally, although hyflex and synchronous remote share some drawbacks, we find that hyflex creates new unique problems and unequal learning environments. Flexibility and accessibility are essential problems in higher education, but we argue that widespread implementation of hyflex courses is not the answer. We conclude with the limited circumstances in which hyflex could be recommended.

Teaching SociologyVol. 53(2)
St. Lawrence University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Online and Blended Learning
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.