Why do prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment differ? Qualitative analyses in a cohort study
Our findings underscore potential mechanisms underlying the disagreement between prospective and retrospective measures, contributing to better understanding of these different constructs and more balanced interpretation of related findings.
Authors
- Louise Arseneault (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2938-2191)
- Kelly Rose‐Clarke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-9184)
- Helen L. Fisher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-2126)
- Oonagh Coleman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2590-1995)
- Jessie R. Baldwin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5703-5058)
- Andrea Danese (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-5412)
- Terrie E. Moffitt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8589-6760)
Institutions
- King's College London (GB)
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Published
- 2024-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107070
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.11
Funders
- Mental Health Research UK
- Wellcome Trust
- UK Research and Innovation
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- King's College London
- Jacobs Foundation
- NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre
- Medical Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development