On the legal interpretation and protection of literary roles in China

The final judgment in 2023 of the case There They Were once again triggers the legal community of China to reflect on the protection of literary roles and the boundary of fan literature creation. Fan literature can be divided into dependent and independent derivative fan literature. Judicial practices of China misunderstand the essence of fan writing, and confuse the protection of role-making with the protection of a role after it is appropriated. The difficulty of protecting literary roles is mainly the protection of role names, so the determination of role names is key to their protection. But the role name itself neither meets the criterion of a work protected by copyright law nor belongs to the name or designation in civil law’s personality rights, nor does it naturally have the purpose or function of a trademark. So the best way to protect the literary role name is to establish a merchandising right, and the limitation of such a right must be set up simultaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2024.03.03
Primary Topic
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the legal interpretation and protection of literary roles in China

Ziyu Zuo
Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
article

On the legal interpretation and protection of literary roles in China

Ziyu Zuo
article en

Abstract

The final judgment in 2023 of the case There They Were once again triggers the legal community of China to reflect on the protection of literary roles and the boundary of fan literature creation. Fan literature can be divided into dependent and independent derivative fan literature. Judicial practices of China misunderstand the essence of fan writing, and confuse the protection of role-making with the protection of a role after it is appropriated. The difficulty of protecting literary roles is mainly the protection of role names, so the determination of role names is key to their protection. But the role name itself neither meets the criterion of a work protected by copyright law nor belongs to the name or designation in civil law’s personality rights, nor does it naturally have the purpose or function of a trademark. So the best way to protect the literary role name is to establish a merchandising right, and the limitation of such a right must be set up simultaneously.

Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual PropertyVol. 14(3)
Sichuan Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.