Quantification of Vaccine Waning as a Challenge Effect

Knowing whether vaccine protection wanes over time is important for health policy and drug development. However, quantifying waning effects is difficult. A simple contrast of vaccine efficacy at two different times compares different populations of individuals: those who were uninfected at the first time versus those who remain uninfected until the second time. Thus, the contrast of vaccine efficacy at early and late times can not be interpreted as a causal effect. We propose to quantify vaccine waning using the challenge effect, which is a contrast of outcomes under controlled exposures to the infectious agent following vaccination. We identify sharp bounds on the challenge effect under nonparametric assumptions that are broadly applicable in vaccine trials using routinely collected data. We demonstrate that the challenge effect can differ substantially from the conventional vaccine efficacy due to depletion of susceptible individuals from the risk set over time. Finally, we apply the methods to derive bounds on the waning of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine using data from a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Our estimates of the challenge effect suggest waning protection after 2 months beyond administration of the second vaccine dose. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2024.2408776
Citations
2
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of Vaccine Waning as a Challenge Effect

Matias Janvin, Mats Julius Stensrud
2 citations
Journal of the American Statistical Association
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.78
article

Quantification of Vaccine Waning as a Challenge Effect

Matias Janvin, Mats Julius Stensrud
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Knowing whether vaccine protection wanes over time is important for health policy and drug development. However, quantifying waning effects is difficult. A simple contrast of vaccine efficacy at two different times compares different populations of individuals: those who were uninfected at the first time versus those who remain uninfected until the second time. Thus, the contrast of vaccine efficacy at early and late times can not be interpreted as a causal effect. We propose to quantify vaccine waning using the challenge effect, which is a contrast of outcomes under controlled exposures to the infectious agent following vaccination. We identify sharp bounds on the challenge effect under nonparametric assumptions that are broadly applicable in vaccine trials using routinely collected data. We demonstrate that the challenge effect can differ substantially from the conventional vaccine efficacy due to depletion of susceptible individuals from the risk set over time. Finally, we apply the methods to derive bounds on the waning of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine using data from a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Our estimates of the challenge effect suggest waning protection after 2 months beyond administration of the second vaccine dose. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

Journal of the American Statistical AssociationVol. 120(549)
University of Oslo (NO), Institute of Mathematics and Informatics (BG), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Mathematics (CZ), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.