Impact of<sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on Clinical Decisions in the Management of Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer
The clinical impact of 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) PET/CT on patient management has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Study subjects were identified retrospectively from a database of a prospective trial for postmarketing surveillance of <sup>18</sup>F-FES between 2021 and 2023. Patients who were suspected or known to have recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on a routine standard workup were included. Planned management before and actual management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT were assessed by 2 experienced medical oncologists via medical chart review. A 5-point questionnaire was provided to evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT for management planning. The rate of intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes, and the impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT according to PET/CT result or clinical indication, were examined. <b>Results:</b> Of the 344 included patients, 120 (35%) experienced a change in management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT. In 139 (40%) patients,<sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT supported the existing management decision without a change in management. Intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes accounted for 64% (77/120) and 68% (82/120) of all changes, respectively. A higher rate of change was observed when lesions were <sup>18</sup>F-FES-negative (44% [36/81]) than <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive (30% [51/172]) or mixed <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive/negative (36% [33/91]). Regarding clinical indications, the highest rate of change was shown when evaluating the origins of metastasis of double primary cancers (64% [9/14]). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT modified the management of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, serving as an impactful imaging modality in clinical practice.
Authors
- Hyehyun Jeong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7277-6463)
- Dae Hyuk Moon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-4276)
- Jeongryul Ryu
- Sangwon Han (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8095-0396)
- Tae-Kyung Yoo
- Il Yong Chung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5271-8530)
- Sae Byul Lee
- Kyung Hae Jung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-7224)
- Hee Jeong Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4509-953X)
- Jaewon Hyung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-4486)
- Jong Won Lee
- Jisun Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-6107)
- Jin‐Hee Ahn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3996-7596)
- Jae Ho Jeong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8749-2612)
- Beom Seok Ko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2448-3006)
- Byung Ho Son (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9137-1162)
- Sung-Bae Kim
Institutions
- Ulsan College (KR)
- Asan Medical Center (KR)
- University of Ulsan (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2024-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267913
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.02