Explanation of time perspectives in adopting AI service robots under different service settings

This study bridges a gap in AI acceptance literature by integrating Time Perspective Theory with the Technology Acceptance Model by examining how time orientations influence AI acceptance in various service settings. The results show that past-positive, present-hedonistic, and future time perspectives impact individuals' privacy concerns and their recognition of AI's utilitarian and hedonic benefits. Conversely, past-negative and present-fatalistic perspectives show negligible effects. The study highlights distinct patterns in credence versus experience services, with future-oriented and present-hedonistic individuals favoring AI's benefits in hospitals over restaurants, and past-positive individuals valuing hedonic benefits more in restaurant settings. These orientations affect perceived usefulness and ease of use, with privacy concerns significantly influencing ease of use. The findings offer significant theoretical and practical implications, underscoring the nuanced role of time perspectives in AI service robot acceptance across different environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104109
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explanation of time perspectives in adopting AI service robots under different service settings

Huy Dang, Robin Roberts, Sara Quach
11 citations
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
11.56
article

Explanation of time perspectives in adopting AI service robots under different service settings

Huy Dang, Robin Roberts, Sara Quach
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This study bridges a gap in AI acceptance literature by integrating Time Perspective Theory with the Technology Acceptance Model by examining how time orientations influence AI acceptance in various service settings. The results show that past-positive, present-hedonistic, and future time perspectives impact individuals' privacy concerns and their recognition of AI's utilitarian and hedonic benefits. Conversely, past-negative and present-fatalistic perspectives show negligible effects. The study highlights distinct patterns in credence versus experience services, with future-oriented and present-hedonistic individuals favoring AI's benefits in hospitals over restaurants, and past-positive individuals valuing hedonic benefits more in restaurant settings. These orientations affect perceived usefulness and ease of use, with privacy concerns significantly influencing ease of use. The findings offer significant theoretical and practical implications, underscoring the nuanced role of time perspectives in AI service robot acceptance across different environments.

Journal of Retailing and Consumer ServicesVol. 82
Griffith University (AU), Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Griffith University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
11.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Explanation of time perspectives in adopting AI service robots under different service settings — Huy Dang, Robin Roberts, et al. · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS