Main lessons learnt from 40 years of R&D on iodine source term prediction: Identification of the main parameters governing iodine volatility in PHEBUS FP tests

Iodine chemistry and phenomenology in the containment has been studied for several decades. The main phenomena leading to the formation of volatile iodine have been identified step by step and their kinetics has been modeled and capitalized over the years in ASTEC-SOPHAEROS IRSN Severe Accident (S.A) code. Recently, the uncertainties for each phenomenon have been quantified and uncertainty propagation calculations have been performed on PHEBUS FPT-0/1/2/3 tests within the objective to identify which phenomena govern iodine volatility. The main highlights from PHEBUS studies are that (1) the sump reactions do not contribute to iodine volatility and (2) the gaseous phase chemical reactions are the main contributor to iodine volatility and (3) only a few gaseous reactions govern iodine volatility in PHEBUS containment. Another objective was to narrow the estimated range of %I 2_RCS (gaseous iodine fraction coming from the RCS). The results show that, considering 43 uncertain parameters, the iodine volatility plume is compatible with the experimental data whatever 2% < %I 2_RCS < 50% that mostly govern iodine volatility in the first days. It also indicates that, as soon as the FP release from the core is stopped and whatever 2% < %I 2_RCS < 50%, the influence of %I 2_RCS decreases over time so that the main processes leading to iodine volatility are slowly switched from %I 2_RCS (short term) to other gaseous phenomena (long term). The influence of %I 2_RCS on iodine volatility is thus important in the short term but becomes less and less significant in the long term (after several days). A more complete analysis is necessary for reactor applications to identify if the same conclusions can be drawn.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105473
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radioactive contamination and transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Main lessons learnt from 40 years of R&D on iodine source term prediction: Identification of the main parameters governing iodine volatility in PHEBUS FP tests

Karine Chevalier-Jabet, L. Bosland
4 citations
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Radioactive contamination and transfer
1.13
article

Main lessons learnt from 40 years of R&D on iodine source term prediction: Identification of the main parameters governing iodine volatility in PHEBUS FP tests

Karine Chevalier-Jabet, L. Bosland
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Iodine chemistry and phenomenology in the containment has been studied for several decades. The main phenomena leading to the formation of volatile iodine have been identified step by step and their kinetics has been modeled and capitalized over the years in ASTEC-SOPHAEROS IRSN Severe Accident (S.A) code. Recently, the uncertainties for each phenomenon have been quantified and uncertainty propagation calculations have been performed on PHEBUS FPT-0/1/2/3 tests within the objective to identify which phenomena govern iodine volatility. The main highlights from PHEBUS studies are that (1) the sump reactions do not contribute to iodine volatility and (2) the gaseous phase chemical reactions are the main contributor to iodine volatility and (3) only a few gaseous reactions govern iodine volatility in PHEBUS containment. Another objective was to narrow the estimated range of %I 2_RCS (gaseous iodine fraction coming from the RCS). The results show that, considering 43 uncertain parameters, the iodine volatility plume is compatible with the experimental data whatever 2% < %I 2_RCS < 50% that mostly govern iodine volatility in the first days. It also indicates that, as soon as the FP release from the core is stopped and whatever 2% < %I 2_RCS < 50%, the influence of %I 2_RCS decreases over time so that the main processes leading to iodine volatility are slowly switched from %I 2_RCS (short term) to other gaseous phenomena (long term). The influence of %I 2_RCS on iodine volatility is thus important in the short term but becomes less and less significant in the long term (after several days). A more complete analysis is necessary for reactor applications to identify if the same conclusions can be drawn.

Progress in Nuclear EnergyVol. 177
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Radioactive contamination and transfer
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.