A comparison of ore pre-concentration efficiency between two high voltage pulse generator systems

• High voltage pulse pre-concentration was compared between two generators. • A gold-copper ore was tested. • Different pre-concentration efficiencies were observed. • Likely caused by differences in the selective breakage of high-grade rocks. High Voltage Pulse (HVP) enabled ore pre-concentration can potentially provide large energy savings and the ability to upgrade low-grade ores for the mining industry. Two types of pulse generator systems commonly used in HVP breakage are Marx generators and pulse transformers. This initial assessment compares the pre-concentration performance of a SelFrag Lab Unit (utilising a Marx generator) and a custom-built HVP machine (employing a pulse transformer) from Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST). Eight sets of experimental results using the two generator systems were collected. Two approaches were taken to analyse the data; a trendline approach using all eight sets of data, and a single-point comparison approach with matched specific energy inputs. The results show that there are significant differences in pre-concentration efficiencies with the HUST machine performing better. To elucidate the potential causes, the degree of size reduction (t 10 ), breakage probability, and selective breakage were investigated for the two generator systems. It is likely that the efficiency of selective breakage is one of the major causes, with the HUST machine presenting better results at selectively breaking high-grade particles and consuming less energy. Additionally, the two generator systems have different energy per discharge levels; the effect of this difference should be investigated in future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals Engineering
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2024.109036
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of ore pre-concentration efficiency between two high voltage pulse generator systems

Daniel Lay, Fengnian Shi, Mengbing He, Christian Antonio
2 citations
Minerals Engineering
Mineral Processing and Grinding
0.43
article

A comparison of ore pre-concentration efficiency between two high voltage pulse generator systems

Daniel Lay, Fengnian Shi, Mengbing He, Christian Antonio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• High voltage pulse pre-concentration was compared between two generators. • A gold-copper ore was tested. • Different pre-concentration efficiencies were observed. • Likely caused by differences in the selective breakage of high-grade rocks. High Voltage Pulse (HVP) enabled ore pre-concentration can potentially provide large energy savings and the ability to upgrade low-grade ores for the mining industry. Two types of pulse generator systems commonly used in HVP breakage are Marx generators and pulse transformers. This initial assessment compares the pre-concentration performance of a SelFrag Lab Unit (utilising a Marx generator) and a custom-built HVP machine (employing a pulse transformer) from Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST). Eight sets of experimental results using the two generator systems were collected. Two approaches were taken to analyse the data; a trendline approach using all eight sets of data, and a single-point comparison approach with matched specific energy inputs. The results show that there are significant differences in pre-concentration efficiencies with the HUST machine performing better. To elucidate the potential causes, the degree of size reduction (t 10 ), breakage probability, and selective breakage were investigated for the two generator systems. It is likely that the efficiency of selective breakage is one of the major causes, with the HUST machine presenting better results at selectively breaking high-grade particles and consuming less energy. Additionally, the two generator systems have different energy per discharge levels; the effect of this difference should be investigated in future work.

Minerals EngineeringVol. 218
The University of Queensland (AU), State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Newmont Corporation, Australian Government, Goldcorp
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Mineral Processing and Grinding
0.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.