Flattenicity as centrality estimator in p–Pb collisions simulated with PYTHIA/Angantyr

Abstract In this paper, a centrality estimator based on flattenicity is studied using PYTHIA 8.312 Angantyr, whose existing implementation is enough to study the particle production in p–Pb collisions in the absence of medium effects. The number of binary nucleon–nucleon collisions for different centrality estimators are compared. The studies include forward multiplicity, forward flattenicity and midrapidity multiplicity. The results using flattenicity show the smallest deviations (<8%) with respect to the results which use impact parameter for centrality classes. On the other hand, the multiplicity-based estimators exhibit huge deviations (up to a factor 2) with respect to the results using impact parameter. The particle ratios (proton-to-pion and kaon-to-pion ratios) and nuclear modification factors as a function of p T are also studied for the different centrality estimators. The studies presented here are relevant to help in the investigation of the plethora of effects, which have been reported by experiments at the Large Hadron Collider.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ad8249
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Random Matrices and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flattenicity as centrality estimator in p–Pb collisions simulated with PYTHIA/Angantyr

F. Fan, G. Bencédi, A. Ortiz Velasquez
2 citations
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics
Random Matrices and Applications
1.42
article

Flattenicity as centrality estimator in p–Pb collisions simulated with PYTHIA/Angantyr

F. Fan, G. Bencédi, A. Ortiz Velasquez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, a centrality estimator based on flattenicity is studied using PYTHIA 8.312 Angantyr, whose existing implementation is enough to study the particle production in p–Pb collisions in the absence of medium effects. The number of binary nucleon–nucleon collisions for different centrality estimators are compared. The studies include forward multiplicity, forward flattenicity and midrapidity multiplicity. The results using flattenicity show the smallest deviations (<8%) with respect to the results which use impact parameter for centrality classes. On the other hand, the multiplicity-based estimators exhibit huge deviations (up to a factor 2) with respect to the results using impact parameter. The particle ratios (proton-to-pion and kaon-to-pion ratios) and nuclear modification factors as a function of p T are also studied for the different centrality estimators. The studies presented here are relevant to help in the investigation of the plethora of effects, which have been reported by experiments at the Large Hadron Collider.

Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsVol. 51(12)
Central China Normal University (CN), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares (MX), HUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics (HU), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Random Matrices and Applications
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flattenicity as centrality estimator in p–Pb collisions simulated with PYTHIA/Angantyr — F. Fan, G. Bencédi, et al. · Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS