Comparison of deep-learning multimodality data fusion strategies in mandibular osteoradionecrosis NTCP modelling using clinical variables and radiation dose distribution volumes

<i>Objective.</i>Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling is rapidly embracing deep learning (DL) methods, acknowledging the importance of spatial dose information. Finding effective ways to combine information from radiation dose distribution maps (dosiomics) and clinical data involves technical challenges and requires domain knowledge. We propose different multi-modality data fusion strategies to facilitate future DL-based NTCP studies.<i>Approach.</i>Early, joint and late DL multi-modality fusion strategies were compared using clinical and mandibular radiation dose distribution volumes. These were contrasted with single-modality models: a random forest trained on non-image data (clinical, demographic and dose-volume metrics) and a 3D DenseNet-40 trained on image data (mandibular dose distribution maps). The study involved a matched cohort of 92 osteoradionecrosis cases and 92 controls from a single institution.<i>Main results.</i>The late fusion model exhibited superior discrimination and calibration performance, while the join fusion achieved a more balanced distribution of the predicted probabilities. Discrimination performance did not significantly differ between strategies. Late fusion, though less technically complex, lacks crucial inter-modality interactions for NTCP modelling. In contrast, joint fusion, despite its complexity, resulted in a single network training process which included intra- and inter-modality interactions in its model parameter optimisation.<i>Significance.</i>This study is a pioneering effort in comparing different strategies for including image data into DL-based NTCP models in combination with lower dimensional data such as clinical variables. The discrimination performance of such multi-modality NTCP models and the choice of fusion strategy will depend on the distribution and quality of both types of data. Multiple data fusion strategies should be compared and reported in multi-modality NTCP modelling using DL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8290
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of deep-learning multimodality data fusion strategies in mandibular osteoradionecrosis NTCP modelling using clinical variables and radiation dose distribution volumes

Laia Humbert‐Vidan, Vinod Patel, Andrew P. King, Teresa Guerrero Urbano
6 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Medical Imaging and Analysis
1.11
article

Comparison of deep-learning multimodality data fusion strategies in mandibular osteoradionecrosis NTCP modelling using clinical variables and radiation dose distribution volumes

Laia Humbert‐Vidan, Vinod Patel, Andrew P. King, Teresa Guerrero Urbano
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling is rapidly embracing deep learning (DL) methods, acknowledging the importance of spatial dose information. Finding effective ways to combine information from radiation dose distribution maps (dosiomics) and clinical data involves technical challenges and requires domain knowledge. We propose different multi-modality data fusion strategies to facilitate future DL-based NTCP studies.<i>Approach.</i>Early, joint and late DL multi-modality fusion strategies were compared using clinical and mandibular radiation dose distribution volumes. These were contrasted with single-modality models: a random forest trained on non-image data (clinical, demographic and dose-volume metrics) and a 3D DenseNet-40 trained on image data (mandibular dose distribution maps). The study involved a matched cohort of 92 osteoradionecrosis cases and 92 controls from a single institution.<i>Main results.</i>The late fusion model exhibited superior discrimination and calibration performance, while the join fusion achieved a more balanced distribution of the predicted probabilities. Discrimination performance did not significantly differ between strategies. Late fusion, though less technically complex, lacks crucial inter-modality interactions for NTCP modelling. In contrast, joint fusion, despite its complexity, resulted in a single network training process which included intra- and inter-modality interactions in its model parameter optimisation.<i>Significance.</i>This study is a pioneering effort in comparing different strategies for including image data into DL-based NTCP models in combination with lower dimensional data such as clinical variables. The discrimination performance of such multi-modality NTCP models and the choice of fusion strategy will depend on the distribution and quality of both types of data. Multiple data fusion strategies should be compared and reported in multi-modality NTCP modelling using DL.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(20)
King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), London South Bank University (GB), London Cancer (GB)
Nvidia
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.