Global perspectives on solar geoengineering: A novel framework for analyzing research in pursuit of effective, inclusive, and just governance

We present a novel analytical framework to evaluate the ethical, political, and justice implications of research on perceptions of emerging technologies. Using the literature on perspectives on solar geoengineering (SG) as an object of study, we develop a framework that interrogates the research process itself. Our framework interrogates whose perceptions are being studied, by whom, using what methods, following which lines of inquiry, and crucially, for what purposes. We do this through the case of SG, a controversial emerging climate intervention technology with potential global social and environmental impacts. We find that SG perspectives research raises important political and justice concerns related to whose perspectives are being studied and for what purposes. We show that SG perspectives research centers the perspectives from the Global North, underrepresents youth perspectives, and that some research aims to increase public support for SG. Ours is the first study to aggregate and quantify this rich empirical data to enable us to visualize these inequities. We also find that investigations of support for SG dominate the literature at the neglect of other important lines of inquiry, such as how cross-cultural perspectives on public engagement and capacity building can inform efforts to institutionalize the inclusion of youth and the Global South in SG discussions. We further find widespread motivation to inform decision-making but without clear direction about how best to do so. We chart a pathway for future perspectives research on SG and broader climate interventions, centered around four recommendations that seek to ameliorate some of these limitations and enhance the potential for perspectives research to enable more effective, inclusive, and just solar geoengineering governance. • Our framework evaluates political and justice dimensions of perspectives research. • Solar geoengineering research has neglected Global South and youth perspectives. • Perspectives researchers are overwhelmingly based in the Global North. • Research focuses on acceptance at the expense of inquiry into other pressing problems. • Existing research inadequately informs policy and other decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103779
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global perspectives on solar geoengineering: A novel framework for analyzing research in pursuit of effective, inclusive, and just governance

Sikina Jinnah, Shuchi Talati, Zachary Dove, Arien J. Hernandez
7 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Climate Change and Geoengineering
1.98
article

Global perspectives on solar geoengineering: A novel framework for analyzing research in pursuit of effective, inclusive, and just governance

Sikina Jinnah, Shuchi Talati, Zachary Dove, Arien J. Hernandez
article en
7 citations

Abstract

We present a novel analytical framework to evaluate the ethical, political, and justice implications of research on perceptions of emerging technologies. Using the literature on perspectives on solar geoengineering (SG) as an object of study, we develop a framework that interrogates the research process itself. Our framework interrogates whose perceptions are being studied, by whom, using what methods, following which lines of inquiry, and crucially, for what purposes. We do this through the case of SG, a controversial emerging climate intervention technology with potential global social and environmental impacts. We find that SG perspectives research raises important political and justice concerns related to whose perspectives are being studied and for what purposes. We show that SG perspectives research centers the perspectives from the Global North, underrepresents youth perspectives, and that some research aims to increase public support for SG. Ours is the first study to aggregate and quantify this rich empirical data to enable us to visualize these inequities. We also find that investigations of support for SG dominate the literature at the neglect of other important lines of inquiry, such as how cross-cultural perspectives on public engagement and capacity building can inform efforts to institutionalize the inclusion of youth and the Global South in SG discussions. We further find widespread motivation to inform decision-making but without clear direction about how best to do so. We chart a pathway for future perspectives research on SG and broader climate interventions, centered around four recommendations that seek to ameliorate some of these limitations and enhance the potential for perspectives research to enable more effective, inclusive, and just solar geoengineering governance. • Our framework evaluates political and justice dimensions of perspectives research. • Solar geoengineering research has neglected Global South and youth perspectives. • Perspectives researchers are overwhelmingly based in the Global North. • Research focuses on acceptance at the expense of inquiry into other pressing problems. • Existing research inadequately informs policy and other decision-making.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 118
University of California, Santa Cruz (US), GeoEngineers (United States) (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.