Optical coherence tomography for optimal stent implantation: what to check?

Optical coherence tomography for optimal stent implantation: what to check?100% ideal for a perfect PCI result but unlikely in many lesions Non-extreme values (80%) provide satisfactory outcomes Very important for outcome Measured by MSA (mm ): Caution for MSA <4.5-5.2 mm 2 , but no unique golden value established Overexpansion (>110-120%) potentially detrimental 1 Measured by MSE (%): 2 If caused by unintended stent deformation: strong clinical impact If major (>400m): possible clinical impact 0% ideal for a perfect PCI result but unlikely in most vessels If minor (<300-400m): negligible clinical impact Stent malapposition: Di cult grading, but adverse prognosis when associated with important lumen reduction (MLA <4.5 mm ) Ideally absent when healthy-to-healthy stent coverage is feasible Residual edge disease: Common anytime landing areas are diseased and with eccentric shape Major (>60 degrees, length >600m) probably clinically impactful Ideally absent when healthy-to-healthy stent coverage is feasible Minor not clinically impactful Edge dissection: Stent expansion:OCT assessment after stent implantation for eventual optimisation.Among various OCT measurements, the key aspect to check after stent implantation are related to stent expansion, presence of dissections and/or residual disease at the stent edges, and stent malapposition.MSA, minimum stent area; MSE, minimum stent expansion; MLA, minimum lumen area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae626
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optical coherence tomography for optimal stent implantation: what to check?

Mattia Lunardi, Enrico Romagnoli, Francesco Burzotta
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
0.57
article

Optical coherence tomography for optimal stent implantation: what to check?

Mattia Lunardi, Enrico Romagnoli, Francesco Burzotta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography for optimal stent implantation: what to check?100% ideal for a perfect PCI result but unlikely in many lesions Non-extreme values (80%) provide satisfactory outcomes Very important for outcome Measured by MSA (mm ): Caution for MSA <4.5-5.2 mm 2 , but no unique golden value established Overexpansion (>110-120%) potentially detrimental 1 Measured by MSE (%): 2 If caused by unintended stent deformation: strong clinical impact If major (>400m): possible clinical impact 0% ideal for a perfect PCI result but unlikely in most vessels If minor (<300-400m): negligible clinical impact Stent malapposition: Di cult grading, but adverse prognosis when associated with important lumen reduction (MLA <4.5 mm ) Ideally absent when healthy-to-healthy stent coverage is feasible Residual edge disease: Common anytime landing areas are diseased and with eccentric shape Major (>60 degrees, length >600m) probably clinically impactful Ideally absent when healthy-to-healthy stent coverage is feasible Minor not clinically impactful Edge dissection: Stent expansion:OCT assessment after stent implantation for eventual optimisation.Among various OCT measurements, the key aspect to check after stent implantation are related to stent expansion, presence of dissections and/or residual disease at the stent edges, and stent malapposition.MSA, minimum stent area; MSE, minimum stent expansion; MLA, minimum lumen area.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(43)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optical coherence tomography for optimal stent implantation: what to check? — Mattia Lunardi, Enrico Romagnoli, et al. · European Heart Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS