An Agreement on Hunting Business as a Civil Agreement

The article discusses issues related to legal regulation in the field of hunting and conservation of hunting resources. Special attention is paid to the civil law regulation of property relations, primarily those of obligations arising in connection with the conclusion and execution of a hunting agreement. As a result of the analysis of the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting”, contradictions of certain norms of the Federal Law “On Hunting” to each other, as well as the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” to the legal requirements of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the vagueness and incompleteness of some legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” were revealed. In such circumstances, the practical application of the provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” by participants in civil turnover is difficult or impossible, and may also lead to negative legal consequences. We consider it necessary to eliminate contradictions between the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” and the current legislation. It is proposed to resolve these issues by making amendments and additions to the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting”, in particular, to the norms on the definition of a hunting agreement, its parties and content. This will improve the quality of the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” and ensure the possibility of their correct practical application by participants in property turnover, since there is a need for this. When writing the article, the following methods were used: general scientific (formal-logical, systemic, structural-functional), general logical methods of theoretical analysis, private scientific methods, including formal-legal and technical-legal analyses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CIVIL LAW
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2024-5-11-14
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Agreement on Hunting Business as a Civil Agreement

Lyubov F. Netishinskaya
CIVIL LAW
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

An Agreement on Hunting Business as a Civil Agreement

Lyubov F. Netishinskaya
article en

Abstract

The article discusses issues related to legal regulation in the field of hunting and conservation of hunting resources. Special attention is paid to the civil law regulation of property relations, primarily those of obligations arising in connection with the conclusion and execution of a hunting agreement. As a result of the analysis of the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting”, contradictions of certain norms of the Federal Law “On Hunting” to each other, as well as the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” to the legal requirements of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the vagueness and incompleteness of some legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” were revealed. In such circumstances, the practical application of the provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” by participants in civil turnover is difficult or impossible, and may also lead to negative legal consequences. We consider it necessary to eliminate contradictions between the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” and the current legislation. It is proposed to resolve these issues by making amendments and additions to the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting”, in particular, to the norms on the definition of a hunting agreement, its parties and content. This will improve the quality of the legislative provisions of the Federal Law “On Hunting” and ensure the possibility of their correct practical application by participants in property turnover, since there is a need for this. When writing the article, the following methods were used: general scientific (formal-logical, systemic, structural-functional), general logical methods of theoretical analysis, private scientific methods, including formal-legal and technical-legal analyses.

CIVIL LAW
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.