Automated Quantification of Simple and Complex Aortic Flow Using 2D Phase Contrast MRI

(1) <i>Background and Objectives</i>: Flow assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides important implications in determining physiologic parameters and clinically important markers. However, post-processing of CMR images remains labor- and time-intensive. This study aims to assess the validity and repeatability of fully automated segmentation of phase contrast velocity-encoded aortic root plane. (2) <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Aortic root images from 125 patients are segmented by artificial intelligence (AI), developed using convolutional neural networks and trained with a multicentre cohort of 160 subjects. Derived simple flow indices (forward and backward flow, systolic flow and velocity) and complex indices (aortic maximum area, systolic flow reversal ratio, flow displacement, and its angle change) were compared with those derived from manual contours. (3) <i>Results</i>: AI-derived simple flow indices yielded excellent repeatability compared to human segmentation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with an insignificant level of bias. Complex flow indices feature good to excellent repeatability (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with insignificant levels of bias except flow displacement angle change and systolic retrograde flow yielding significant levels of bias (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> < 0.05, respectively). (4) <i>Conclusions</i>: Automated flow quantification using aortic root images is comparable to human segmentation and has good to excellent repeatability. However, flow helicity and systolic retrograde flow are associated with a significant level of bias. Overall, all parameters show clinical repeatability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101618
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Quantification of Simple and Complex Aortic Flow Using 2D Phase Contrast MRI

Xiaodan Zhao, Hilmar Spohr, Hosamadin Assadi, Vaishali Limbachia et al.
Medicina
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Automated Quantification of Simple and Complex Aortic Flow Using 2D Phase Contrast MRI

Xiaodan Zhao, Hilmar Spohr, Hosamadin Assadi, Vaishali Limbachia, Ciaran Grafton‐Clarke, Pankaj Garg, Peter Swoboda, Zia Mehmood, Rob J. van der Geest, John J. Curtin, Bahman Kasmai, Rimma Hall, Kurian Thampi, David Hewson, Gareth B. Matthews, Vassilios S. Vassiliou, Marianna Stamatelatou, Liang Zhong, Marina Hughes, Samer Alabed, Rui Li, Yashoda Gurung-Koney, Andrew J. Swift, Sunil Nair
article en

Abstract

(1) <i>Background and Objectives</i>: Flow assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides important implications in determining physiologic parameters and clinically important markers. However, post-processing of CMR images remains labor- and time-intensive. This study aims to assess the validity and repeatability of fully automated segmentation of phase contrast velocity-encoded aortic root plane. (2) <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Aortic root images from 125 patients are segmented by artificial intelligence (AI), developed using convolutional neural networks and trained with a multicentre cohort of 160 subjects. Derived simple flow indices (forward and backward flow, systolic flow and velocity) and complex indices (aortic maximum area, systolic flow reversal ratio, flow displacement, and its angle change) were compared with those derived from manual contours. (3) <i>Results</i>: AI-derived simple flow indices yielded excellent repeatability compared to human segmentation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with an insignificant level of bias. Complex flow indices feature good to excellent repeatability (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with insignificant levels of bias except flow displacement angle change and systolic retrograde flow yielding significant levels of bias (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> < 0.05, respectively). (4) <i>Conclusions</i>: Automated flow quantification using aortic root images is comparable to human segmentation and has good to excellent repeatability. However, flow helicity and systolic retrograde flow are associated with a significant level of bias. Overall, all parameters show clinical repeatability.

MedicinaVol. 60(10)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Leeds (GB), National University of Singapore (SG), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), National Heart Centre Singapore (SG), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.