Uncertainty and Latin Hypercube Sampling in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

A soil–foundation–structure system (SFSS) often exhibits different responses compared to a fixed-base structure when subjected to earthquake ground motion. Both kinematic and inertial soil–foundation–structure interactions can significantly influence the structural performance of buildings. Numerous parameters within an SFSS affect its overall response, introducing inherent uncertainty into the solution. Performing time history analyses, even for a linear elastic coupled SFSS, requires considerable computational effort. To reduce the computational cost without compromising accuracy, the use of the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) technique is proposed herein. Sampling techniques are rarely employed in soil–foundation–structure interaction analyses, yet they are highly beneficial. These methodologies allow analyses determined by sampling to be conducted using commercial codes designed for deterministic analyses, without requiring any modifications. The advantage is that the number of analyses determined by the sampling size is significantly reduced as compared to considering all combinations of input parameters. After identifying the important samples, one can evaluate the seismic demand of selected soil–foundation–bridge pier systems using finite element numerical software. This paper indicates that LHS reduces computational effort by 60%, whereas structural response components (translation, rocking) show distinct trends for different systems.