Which socio-economic groups benefit most from public health expenditure in Senegal? A dynamic benefit incidence analysis

Despite efforts to enhance public investment in Senegal's health sector, the equitable distribution of benefits between socioeconomic groups remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, our study examines the progressive (or regressive) nature of public health expenditure. Utilizing data from the latest survey on household living conditions (2018-2019) in conjunction with administrative data on health expenditure from the same period (provided by the Ministry of Health of Senegal), we performed a benefit incidence analysis. This entailed segmenting the population by poverty quintiles and subsequently estimating how each group utilized and benefitted from public health expenditure, according to level of care and geographical location. Additionally, we performed a marginal benefit analysis to discern the impact of an increase in public health expenditure on various socioeconomic groups. Our findings unveil a pro-rich distribution of benefits at both primary healthcare and hospital levels, observable both at national and regional levels. Moreover, disparities in the distribution of resource allocation between Senegal's 14 administrative regions were observed. Ultimately, our results indicate that under prevailing conditions, increasing public health expenditure would not yield a pro-poor distribution of benefits. Therefore, our research underscores the imperative of better targeting populations for greater equity between regions and social groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Population Health
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101714
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which socio-economic groups benefit most from public health expenditure in Senegal? A dynamic benefit incidence analysis

Ibrahima Thiam, Mouhamed Samba, Élisabeth Paul
6 citations
SSM - Population Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
3.23
article

Which socio-economic groups benefit most from public health expenditure in Senegal? A dynamic benefit incidence analysis

Ibrahima Thiam, Mouhamed Samba, Élisabeth Paul
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Despite efforts to enhance public investment in Senegal's health sector, the equitable distribution of benefits between socioeconomic groups remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, our study examines the progressive (or regressive) nature of public health expenditure. Utilizing data from the latest survey on household living conditions (2018-2019) in conjunction with administrative data on health expenditure from the same period (provided by the Ministry of Health of Senegal), we performed a benefit incidence analysis. This entailed segmenting the population by poverty quintiles and subsequently estimating how each group utilized and benefitted from public health expenditure, according to level of care and geographical location. Additionally, we performed a marginal benefit analysis to discern the impact of an increase in public health expenditure on various socioeconomic groups. Our findings unveil a pro-rich distribution of benefits at both primary healthcare and hospital levels, observable both at national and regional levels. Moreover, disparities in the distribution of resource allocation between Senegal's 14 administrative regions were observed. Ultimately, our results indicate that under prevailing conditions, increasing public health expenditure would not yield a pro-poor distribution of benefits. Therefore, our research underscores the imperative of better targeting populations for greater equity between regions and social groups.

SSM - Population HealthVol. 28
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), University of Liège (BE), Université de Thiès (SN)
Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Belgisch Ontwikkelingsagentschap, Académie de recherche et d'enseignement supérieur
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
3.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.