Cultural keystone species and their role in biocultural conservation

Abstract Biocultural diversity is declining globally. Cultural keystone species (CKS) are one promising pathway by which biocultural approaches to conservation, which seek to protect both biological and cultural diversity, might be implemented in practice. We traced the evolution of the CKS concept in relation to Indigenous Peoples in the Canadian context through a scoping review of the literature from 2000 to 2021 and nine in‐depth interviews with Indigenous Guardians and knowledge holders. Emergent themes in this scoping review indicate that CKS, rather than being viewed as objects for conservation, can be understood as ongoing relationship(s) between the cultural and ecological, which are intimately tied to language, knowledge, practices, and places in ways that are deeply interconnected. One cannot protect CKS, therefore, without also protecting the relationships that people (or groups of people) have to that species. We conclude by recommending further investment in policies and programs that support enabling mechanisms for Indigenous Peoples to maintain, manage, and restore relationships with CKS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13224
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural keystone species and their role in biocultural conservation

Jessica Lukawiecki, Robin Roth, Faisal Moola
9 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
7.64
article

Cultural keystone species and their role in biocultural conservation

Jessica Lukawiecki, Robin Roth, Faisal Moola
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Biocultural diversity is declining globally. Cultural keystone species (CKS) are one promising pathway by which biocultural approaches to conservation, which seek to protect both biological and cultural diversity, might be implemented in practice. We traced the evolution of the CKS concept in relation to Indigenous Peoples in the Canadian context through a scoping review of the literature from 2000 to 2021 and nine in‐depth interviews with Indigenous Guardians and knowledge holders. Emergent themes in this scoping review indicate that CKS, rather than being viewed as objects for conservation, can be understood as ongoing relationship(s) between the cultural and ecological, which are intimately tied to language, knowledge, practices, and places in ways that are deeply interconnected. One cannot protect CKS, therefore, without also protecting the relationships that people (or groups of people) have to that species. We conclude by recommending further investment in policies and programs that support enabling mechanisms for Indigenous Peoples to maintain, manage, and restore relationships with CKS.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 6(11)
University of Guelph (CA)
Parks Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
7.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cultural keystone species and their role in biocultural conservation — Jessica Lukawiecki, Robin Roth, et al. · Conservation Science and Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS