De-risking Death-traps in Uncontrolled Industrialization: Factory Act and Industrial Health and Safety in Republican China

Abstract In Republican China, the Factory Act was first promulgated in 1929, after almost thirty years of unregulated industrialization. Little academic effort has been made to comprehend its actual implementation. Some academics have dismissed it as completely useless, while others have credited it with various enhancements in working conditions. This article focuses on workplace health and safety issues and critically evaluates the implementation of the law to scrutinize its effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) in addressing workers’ life and death matters. This article aims to reassert the Factory Act in China's modern history of industrial development. It points out that despite its inadequate enforcement, the law was significant in laying the foundation for the national institutionalization of state responsibility to systematically monitor and regulate workplace health and safety and paving the way for further safety legislation. Nevertheless, the law fell short of safeguarding workers’ rights during industrial accidents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chinese History
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jch.2024.21
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-risking Death-traps in Uncontrolled Industrialization: Factory Act and Industrial Health and Safety in Republican China

B.E. Lee
Journal of Chinese History
Chinese history and philosophy
article

De-risking Death-traps in Uncontrolled Industrialization: Factory Act and Industrial Health and Safety in Republican China

B.E. Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Republican China, the Factory Act was first promulgated in 1929, after almost thirty years of unregulated industrialization. Little academic effort has been made to comprehend its actual implementation. Some academics have dismissed it as completely useless, while others have credited it with various enhancements in working conditions. This article focuses on workplace health and safety issues and critically evaluates the implementation of the law to scrutinize its effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) in addressing workers’ life and death matters. This article aims to reassert the Factory Act in China's modern history of industrial development. It points out that despite its inadequate enforcement, the law was significant in laying the foundation for the national institutionalization of state responsibility to systematically monitor and regulate workplace health and safety and paving the way for further safety legislation. Nevertheless, the law fell short of safeguarding workers’ rights during industrial accidents.

Journal of Chinese HistoryVol. 10(1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

De-risking Death-traps in Uncontrolled Industrialization: Factory Act and Industrial Health and Safety in Republican China — B.E. Lee · Journal of Chinese History (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS