Citizens’ perceptions of online abuse directed at politicians: Evidence from a survey experiment

Abstract Online abuse is becoming an increasingly pressing issue for democratic societies. Citizens play an important role in curtailing abuse as they often moderate online content through counter speech and by reporting abusive messages. However, we know little about when citizens actually perceive negative comments directed at politicians as being abusive, and the factors shaping these perceptions are also understudied. In this study, we therefore investigate how citizens perceive criticism, insults, threats and sexist remarks directed at politicians on social media. Based on a survey experiment with 2,000 Danish citizens, we show that citizens’ assessments of the abusiveness of such remarks are not only affected by the content of the messages, but also by political ideology, political trust and gender. Surprisingly, partisanship does not seem to substantively affect perceptions of abuse. Our study provides novel insights into what exactly citizens consider to be abusive behaviour on social media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12724
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizens’ perceptions of online abuse directed at politicians: Evidence from a survey experiment

Mads Thau, Niels Bjørn Grund Petersen, Rasmus T. Pedersen
5 citations
European Journal of Political Research
Social Media and Politics
4.79
article

Citizens’ perceptions of online abuse directed at politicians: Evidence from a survey experiment

Mads Thau, Niels Bjørn Grund Petersen, Rasmus T. Pedersen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Online abuse is becoming an increasingly pressing issue for democratic societies. Citizens play an important role in curtailing abuse as they often moderate online content through counter speech and by reporting abusive messages. However, we know little about when citizens actually perceive negative comments directed at politicians as being abusive, and the factors shaping these perceptions are also understudied. In this study, we therefore investigate how citizens perceive criticism, insults, threats and sexist remarks directed at politicians on social media. Based on a survey experiment with 2,000 Danish citizens, we show that citizens’ assessments of the abusiveness of such remarks are not only affected by the content of the messages, but also by political ideology, political trust and gender. Surprisingly, partisanship does not seem to substantively affect perceptions of abuse. Our study provides novel insights into what exactly citizens consider to be abusive behaviour on social media.

European Journal of Political ResearchVol. 64(2)
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research (DK), Institute for Social Research (NO)
TrygFonden
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Media and Politics
4.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.